首页> 外文期刊>Research policy >Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: Destruction, disruption or creative accumulation?
【24h】

Technological discontinuities and the challenge for incumbent firms: Destruction, disruption or creative accumulation?

机译:技术上的不连续性和现有企业所面临的挑战:破坏,破坏或创造性积累?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

The creative destruction of existing industries as a consequence of discontinuous technological change is a central theme in the literature on industrial innovation and technological development. Established competence-based and market-based explanations of this phenomenon argue that incumbents are seriously challenged only by 'competence-destroying' or 'disruptive' innovations, which make their existing knowledge base or business models obsolete and leave them vulnerable to attacks from new entrants. This paper challenges these arguments. With detailed empirical analyses of the automotive and gas turbine industries, we demonstrate that these explanations overestimate the ability of new entrants to destroy and disrupt established industries and underestimate the capacity of incumbents to perceive the potential of new technologies and integrate them with existing capabilities. Moreover, we show how intense competition in the wake of technological discontinuities, driven entirely by incumbents, may instead result in late industry shakeouts. We develop and extend the notion of 'creative accumulation' as a way of conceptualizing the innovating capacity of the incumbents that appear to master such turbulence. Specifically, we argue that creative accumulation requires firms to handle a triple challenge of simultaneously (a) fine-tuning and evolving existing technologies at a rapid pace, (b) acquiring and developing new technologies and resources and (c) integrating novel and existing knowledge into superior products and solutions.
机译:不连续的技术变革对现有产业的创造性破坏是有关工业创新和技术发展的文献的中心主题。对这种现象的基于能力和市场的既定解释认为,现有企业仅受到“能力破坏”或“破坏性”创新的严重挑战,这会使他们现有的知识库或业务模型过时,并使他们容易受到新进入者的攻击。本文对这些论点提出了挑战。通过对汽车和燃气轮机行业进行详细的实证分析,我们证明了这些解释高估了新进入者摧毁和破坏既有行业的能力,并低估了老牌企业感知新技术潜力并将其与现有能力整合的能力。此外,我们展示了完全由现有企业驱动的技术中断带来的激烈竞争反而可能导致后期的行业动荡。我们发展和扩展“创意积累”的概念,作为概念化似乎掌握了这种动荡的现任公司的创新能力的一种方式。具体来说,我们认为创意积累需要企业同时应对三重挑战:(a)快速调整和发展现有技术;(b)获取和开发新技术和资源;(c)整合新知识和现有知识成为优质的产品和解决方案。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Research policy》 |2013年第7期|1210-1224|共15页
  • 作者单位

    KITE Research Group, Department of Management and Engineering, Linkoeping University, SE-581 83 Linkoeping, Sweden;

    KITE Research Group, Department of Management and Engineering, Linkoeping University, SE-581 83 Linkoeping, Sweden;

    KITE Research Group, Department of Management and Engineering, Linkoeping University, SE-581 83 Linkoeping, Sweden;

    KITE Research Group, Department of Management and Engineering, Linkoeping University, SE-581 83 Linkoeping, Sweden,CENTRIM (Centre for Research in Innovation Management), The Freeman Centre, University of Brighton Falmer, Brighton, East Sussex BN1 9QE, England, United Kingdom;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Creative accumulation; Technological discontinuity; Creative destruction; Disruptive innovation; Competence-destroying innovation;

    机译:创意积累;技术上的不连续性;创造性破坏;破坏性创新;破坏能力的创新;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号