This article examines media interviews with Hamas political leaders conducted between January 2006 and December 2008, immediately before the outbreak of war in Gaza. The analysis presented here focuses on the role of footing shifts in the posing of challenging questions and their consequential relevance for the exchange that followed in which Hamas leaders attended to interviewers' challenging questions and provided their own accounts. The results show that interviewers' footing shifts confer interactional benefits on interviewers and interviewees alike. Such footing shifts allow all participants to construct their discussion as being ânewsworthyâ in being relevant to a wider audience and allow interviewers to do âneutralism.â At the same time, footing shifts that attribute contentious allegations to third parties allow interviewees to criticize the nominated sources. In so doing, initial footing shifts enable discussions of contentious topics to proceed without breakdown.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2011.546057
展开▼