...
首页> 外文期刊>Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews >Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems
【24h】

Burden of proof: A comprehensive review of the feasibility of 100% renewable-electricity systems

机译:举证责任:全面审查100%可再生电力系统的可行性

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

An effective response to climate change demands rapid replacement of fossil carbon energy sources. This must occur concurrently with an ongoing rise in total global energy consumption. While many modelled scenarios have been published claiming to show that a 100% renewable electricity system is achievable, there is no empirical or historical evidence that demonstrates that such systems are in fact feasible. Of the studies published to date, 24 have forecast regional, national or global energy requirements at sufficient detail to be considered potentially credible. We critically review these studies using four novel feasibility criteria for reliable electricity systems needed to meet electricity demand this century. These criteria are: (1) consistency with mainstream energy-demand forecasts; (2) simulating supply to meet demand reliably at hourly, half-hourly, and five-minute timescales, with resilience to extreme climate events; (3) identifying necessary transmission and distribution requirements; and (4) maintaining the provision of essential ancillary services. Evaluated against these objective criteria, none of the 24 studies provides convincing evidence that these basic feasibility criteria can be met. Of a maximum possible unweighted feasibility score of seven, the highest score for any one study was four. Eight of 24 scenarios (33%) provided no form of system simulation. Twelve (50%) relied on unrealistic forecasts of energy demand. While four studies (17%; all regional) articulated transmission requirements, only two scenarios drawn from the same study addressed ancillary-service requirements. In addition to feasibility issues, the heavy reliance on exploitation of hydroelectricity and biomass raises concerns regarding environmental sustainability and social justice. Strong empirical evidence of feasibility must be demonstrated for any study that attempts to construct or model a low-carbon energy future based on any combination of low-carbon technology. On the basis of this review, efforts to date seem to have substantially underestimated the challenge and delayed the identification and implementation of effective and comprehensive decarbonization pathways.
机译:为了有效应对气候变化,需要迅速更换化石碳能源。这必须与全球总能源消耗的持续增长同时发生。虽然已经发布了许多模型化的场景,声称它们表明可以实现100%的可再生电力系统,但是没有经验或历史证据表明这种系统实际上是可行的。在迄今为止发表的研究中,有24项预测了区域,国家或全球能源需求的详细情况,足以被认为是可信的。我们使用四个新颖的​​可行性标准来严格审查这些研究,这些标准是满足本世纪电力需求所需的可靠电力系统的。这些标准是:(1)与主流能源需求预测保持一致; (2)在每小时,每半小时和五分钟的时间范围内模拟供应量以可靠地满足需求,并具有抵御极端气候事件的能力; (3)确定必要的传输和分配要求; (四)保持基本配套服务的提供。根据这些客观标准进行评估,这24项研究均未提供令人信服的证据证明可以满足这些基本可行性标准。在最大可能的未加权可行性评分为7中,任何一项研究的最高评分为4。 24个场景中的八个(33%)没有提供任何形式的系统仿真。十二(50%)依赖对能源需求的不切实际的预测。尽管有四项研究(占所有地区的17%;所有地区)都明确了传输的要求,但从同一项研究得出的只有两种情况解决了辅助服务的要求。除可行性问题外,对水力发电和生物质能的严重依赖引起了人们对环境可持续性和社会正义的关注。对于任何试图基于低碳技术的组合来构建或模拟低碳能源未来的研究,都必须证明其可行性的强有力的经验证据。根据这项审查,迄今为止的努力似乎大大低估了这一挑战,并拖延了有效和全面脱碳途径的查明和实施。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号