首页> 外文期刊>BMC Geriatrics >Effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment intervention on quality of life, caregiver burden and length of hospital stay: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials
【24h】

Effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment intervention on quality of life, caregiver burden and length of hospital stay: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

机译:综合性老年评估干预对生命质量,护理人员负担和住院时间段的有效性:随机对照试验的系统审查和荟萃分析

获取原文
       

摘要

Comprehensive geriatric assessment (CGA) interventions can improve functional ability and reduce mortality in older adults, but the effectiveness of CGA intervention on the quality of life, caregiver burden, and length of hospital stay remains unclear. The study aimed to determine the effectiveness of CGA intervention on the quality of life, length of hospital stay, and caregiver burden in older adults by conducting meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials (RCTs). A literature search in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library was conducted for papers published before February 29, 2020, based on inclusion criteria. Standardised mean difference (SMD) or mean difference (MD) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated using the random-effects model. Subgroup analyses, sensitivity analyses, and publication bias analyses were also conducted. A total of 28 RCTs were included. Overall, the intervention components common in different CGA intervention models were interdisciplinary assessments and team meetings. Meta-analyses showed that CGA interventions improved the quality of life of older people (SMD?=?0.12; 95% CI?=?0.03 to 0.21; P?=?0.009) compared to usual care, and subgroup analyses showed that CGA interventions improved the quality of life only in participants’ age??80?years and at follow-up ≤3?months. The change value of quality of life in the CGA intervention group was better than that in the usual care group on six dimensions of the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36). Also, compared to usual care, the CGA intervention reduced the caregiver burden (SMD?=???0.56; 95% CI?=???0.97?to ??0.15, P?=?0.007), but had no significant effect on the length of hospital stay. CGA intervention was effective in improving the quality of life and reducing caregiver burden, but did not affect the length of hospital stay. It is recommended that future studies apply the SF-36 to evaluate the impact of CGA interventions on the quality of life and provide supportive strategies for caregivers as an essential part of the CGA intervention, to find additional benefits of CGA interventions.
机译:综合老年评估(CGA)干预措施可以改善功能能力,减少老年人的死亡率,但CGA干预对生命质量,照顾者负担和住院住院的长度的有效性尚不清楚。该研究旨在通过进行随机对照试验(RCT)的荟萃分析来确定CGA干预CGA干预对老年人的生活质量,住院住院长度和照顾者负担。根据纳入标准,在2020年2月29日之前发布的论文进行了文献搜索。使用随机效应模型计算标准化平均差异(SMD)或平均差异(MD)具有95%置信区间(CIS)。还进行了亚组分析,灵敏度分析和出版物偏见分析。共有28个RCT。总体而言,不同CGA干预模型中共同的干预组件是跨学科评估和团队会议。荟萃分析表明,CGA干预改善了老年人的生活质量(SMD?= 0.12; 95%CI?= 0.03至0.21; p?= 0.009)与通常的护理相比,亚组分析显示CGA干预措施只有在参与者年龄的生活质量提高了生活质量? CGA干预组生活质量的变化价值优于36项短型健康调查问卷(SF-36)的六个方面的六个维度中的六个方面。另外,与常规护理相比,CGA干预减少了护理人员负担(SMD?= ??? 0.56; 95%CI?= ??? 0.97?0.15,P?= 0.007),但没有显着效果在住院时间的终止。 CGA干预方面有效地改善了生活质量和减少护理人员负担,但不影响住院时间的终止。建议将来的研究适用于SF-36,评估CGA干预对生命质量的影响,并为护理人员提供支持战略,作为CGA干预的重要组成部分,寻找CGA干预措施的额外福利。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号