首页> 外文期刊>Reliability Engineering & System Safety >A proactive operational risk identification and analysis framework based on the integration of ACAT and FRAM
【24h】

A proactive operational risk identification and analysis framework based on the integration of ACAT and FRAM

机译:基于ACAT和FRAM集成的前瞻性操作风险识别和分析框架

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Risks in the industrial operation processes involve complex system elements such as human, machine, organization, information, as well as nonlinear coupling relationships among them. Traditional risk analysis methods focus on the cause-effect relationships between the system elements and accidents, while ignoring what the correct and proper relationships should be. For a proactive risk identification and analysis, learning from success is suggested instead of learning from post hoc accidents, which requires that risk analysis identifies the normal functions and their couplings. Therefore, system functioning has been a subject of interest in the field of risk analysis. The Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) has been an effective tool to reveal the couplings and dependent relationships among different functions. However, the functions identification and interaction analysis in the FRAM is limited because there is no consistent or explicit stop rule. For a detailed and rigorous description of functions, the Accident Causation Analysis and Taxonomy (ACAT) model is used to enrich the FRAM by generating functions based on a closed-loop control system. Two operation processes in the hazardous industries are used as illustrations. The results show that more functional constraints and deep contributing factors to accidents can be identified with the hybrid approach.
机译:工业运营过程中的风险涉及复杂的系统元素,例如人,机器,组织,信息以及它们之间的非线性耦合关系。传统的风险分析方法侧重于系统要素与事故之间的因果关系,而忽略了正确和适当的关系。为了进行主动的风险识别和分析,建议从成功中学习,而不是从事后事故中学习,这要求风险分析可以识别正常功能及其耦合。因此,系统功能一直是风险分析领域的关注主题。功能共振分析方法(FRAM)已成为揭示不同功能之间的耦合和依赖关系的有效工具。但是,由于没有一致或明确的停止规则,FRAM中的功能识别和交互分析受到限制。为了对功能进行详细而严格的描述,使用事故因果分析和分类法(ACAT)模型通过基于闭环控制系统生成功能来丰富FRAM。举例说明了危险行业中的两个操作过程。结果表明,使用混合方法可以识别出更多的功能约束和造成事故的深层因素。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Reliability Engineering & System Safety》 |2019年第6期|101-109|共9页
  • 作者单位

    Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Min & Safety Engn, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China|Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Min Disaster Prevent & Control, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China;

    Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Min & Safety Engn, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China|Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Min Disaster Prevent & Control, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China;

    Shandong HELP Safety & Environm Protect Technol P, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China;

    Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, Coll Min & Safety Engn, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China|Shandong Univ Sci & Technol, State Key Lab Min Disaster Prevent & Control, Qingdao, Shandong, Peoples R China;

  • 收录信息 美国《科学引文索引》(SCI);美国《工程索引》(EI);
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    FRAM; ACAT; Risk identification; Risk analysis; Operational risk;

    机译:FRAM;ACAT;风险识别;风险分析;操作风险;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号