首页> 外文期刊>Reliability Engineering & System Safety >The effect of discounting, different mortality reduction schemes and predictive cohort life tables on risk acceptability criteria
【24h】

The effect of discounting, different mortality reduction schemes and predictive cohort life tables on risk acceptability criteria

机译:折现,不同的死亡率降低方案和预测的队列寿命表对风险可接受性标准的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Technical facilities should be optimal with respect to benefits and cost. Optimization of technical facilities involving risks for human life and limb require an acceptability criterion and suitable discount rates both for the public and the operator depending on for whom the optimization is carried out. The life quality index is presented and embedded into modem socio-economic concepts. A general risk acceptability criterion is derived. The societal life saving cost to be used in optimization as life saving or compensation cost and the societal willingness-to-pay based on the societal value of a statistical life or on the societal life quality index are developed. Different mortality reduction schemes are studied. Also, predictive cohort life tables are derived and applied. Discount rates γ must be long-term averages in view of the time horizon of some 20 to more than 100 years for the facilities of interest and net of inflation and taxes. While the operator may use long-term averages from the financial market for his cost-benefit analysis the assessment of interest rates for investments of the public into risk reduction is more difficult. The classical Ramsey model decomposes the real interest rate ( = output growth rate) into the rate of time preference of consumption and the rate of economical growth multiplied by the elasticity of marginal utility of consumption. It is proposed to use a relatively small interest rate of 3% implying a rate of time preference of consumption of about 1%. This appears intergenerationally acceptable from an ethical point of view. Risk-consequence curves are derived for an example.
机译:就收益和成本而言,技术设施应该是最佳的。对涉及生命和肢体风险的技术设施进行优化,需要一个可接受的标准,并针对公众和运营商(取决于进行优化的对象),采用适当的折现率。提出了生活质量指数并将其嵌入现代社会经济概念中。得出了一般风险可接受性标准。制定了用于优化的社会救生费用,作为救生或补偿费用,并根据统计生活的社会价值或社会生活质量指标制定了社会支付意愿。研究了不同的死亡率降低方案。同样,推导并应用了预测性队列寿命表。考虑到利息设施以及扣除通货膨胀和税收的约20至100年以上的时间范围,折现率γ必须是长期平均值。尽管运营商可能会使用金融市场的长期平均值进行成本效益分析,但评估公众对降低风险的投资的利率却更加困难。经典的拉姆齐模型将实际利率(=产出增长率)分解为消费的时间偏好率和经济增长率乘以消费的边际效用弹性。建议使用相对较小的3%利率,这意味着消费的时间偏好率约为1%。从伦理的角度来看,这似乎是世代相传的。以风险后果曲线为例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号