首页> 外文期刊>Regional Studies >Mobility and urban quality of life: a comparison of the hedonic pricing and subjective well-being methods
【24h】

Mobility and urban quality of life: a comparison of the hedonic pricing and subjective well-being methods

机译:流动性和城市生活质量:比较百建理定价和主观福祉方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There is no consensus about the relation between urban scale and quality of life. Quality of life in Oslo and the rest of Norway is compared using two commonly employed methods to measure geographical variation in quality of life: hedonic pricing based on the Rosen-Roback model and analysis of subjective well-being. Since the hedonic pricing approach assumes that households are perfectly mobile, the population is divided into mobility quartiles. The methods arrive at the same conclusion for the most mobile population group - quality of life is higher in Oslo - but different conclusions are reached for other mobility groups.
机译:对城市规模与生活质量之间的关系没有共识。奥斯陆的生活质量和挪威其他地区使用两种通常采用的方法进行比较,以衡量生活质量的地理变化:基于Rosen-Roback模型的蜂鸟定价和主观幸福性分析。由于诸着惠烟定价方法假设家庭完全移动,人口分为流动性四分位数。该方法对最多的流动人口组得出相同的结论 - 奥斯陆的生活质量较高 - 但其他移动组达到了不同的结论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号