首页> 外文期刊>Reeves journal >Definitions are Important Insurance companies can choose not to defend based on exclusions
【24h】

Definitions are Important Insurance companies can choose not to defend based on exclusions

机译:定义很重要保险公司可以基于排除条款选择不辩护

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This is a case where an insurance company was able to withdraw its defense based on its policy, which excluded condominiums and townhouses. In this case the developments were condominiums that had the appearance of detached, single-family homes. California Traditions, Inc. was the developer of a housing project. They hired Ja-Con Systems, Inc. to perform the rough framing work for 30 of the units in the development. Ja-Con was insured with a Comprehensive General Liability Policy by Clare-mont Insurance Company for the duration of the project. The owner of Ja-Con knew his policy did not cover work on condominium projects. Each of the units were freestanding with no shared walls, roofs, halls, or plumbing or electrical lines. To avoid "set-back" requirements for single family homes, the project was developed, marketed and sold as condominiums.
机译:在这种情况下,一家保险公司能够根据其政策撤回其辩护,其中不包括公寓和联排别墅。在这种情况下,开发项目是具有独立式单户住宅外观的公寓。加利福尼亚传统公司是一个住房项目的开发商。他们聘请了Ja-Con Systems,Inc.对开发中的30个单元进行粗糙的框架工作。在项目执行期间,Ja-Con已由克莱尔蒙特保险公司(Clare-mont Insurance Company)为其提供了综合全面责任险。 Ja-Con的所有者知道他的政策并不涵盖公寓项目的工作。每个单元都是独立的,没有共用的墙壁,屋顶,大厅,管道或电线。为了避免单户住宅的“退缩”要求,该项目被开发,销售和出售为公寓。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号