...
【24h】

Get busy

机译:忙起来

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A recent case from the Court of Appeal, Blanchette v. Superior Court, highlights the need to strictly comply with the time limitations of the homebuilder's Right to Repair Act in order to claim that defense to a claim for construction defects. In 2002, the Legislature adopted what is known as the Right to Repair Act, which are a series of Civil Code provisions pertaining to new residential construction where the purchase agreement with the buyer was signed by the seller on or after Jan. 1,2003. It does not apply to remodeling projects and does not apply to homes bought before 2003. It provides that before a homeowner or a homeowners association can file suit against the builder for con-struction defects, they first must follow strict pre-litigation proce-dures which include a notice to the builder of the claim with spe-cific notice requirements; after receipt of that notice, the builder has a strict time period of 14 days to acknowledge receipt of the claim and thereafter has another 14 days to conduct an inspection; after that inspection, the builder has exactly 30 days to make an offer to repair or pay for the defects.
机译:上诉法院在Blanchette诉高级法院一案中最近提出的一个案件强调,必须严格遵守房屋建筑商的《修复权法》的时限,以便就建筑缺陷索赔提出抗辩。 2002年,立法机关采用了所谓的《修复权法》,这是与新住宅建筑有关的一系列民法规定,在2003年1月1日或之后,卖方与买方签订了购买协议。它不适用于改建项目,也不适用于2003年之前购买的房屋。它规定,在房主或房主协会可以针对建筑缺陷提出针对建筑商的诉讼之前,他们必须首先遵循严格的诉讼前程序。其中包括向建造者发出的通知,并带有特定的通知要求;收到该通知后,建造商有严格的14天时间确认收到索赔,此后又有14天进行检查;在检查之后,建筑商有正好30天的时间提出维修或赔偿缺陷的要约。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号