首页> 外文期刊>Records management journal >Recordkeeping and research data management: a review of perspectives
【24h】

Recordkeeping and research data management: a review of perspectives

机译:记录保存和研究数据管理:观点回顾

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to explore a range of perspectives on the relationship between research data and records and between recordkeeping and research data management. Design/methodology/approach - This paper discusses literature in the field of research data management as part of preliminary work for the author's doctoral research on the topic. The literature included in the review reflects contemporary and historical perspectives on the management and preservation of research data. Findings - Preliminary findings indicate that records professionals have been involved in the management and preservation of research data since the early twentieth century. In the literature, research data is described as comparable to records, and records professionals are widely acknowledged to have skills and expertise which are applicable to research data management. Records professionals are one of a number of professions addressing research data management. However, they are not currently considered to be leaders in research data management practice. Originality/value - Research data management is an emerging challenge as stakeholders in the research lifecycle increasingly mandate the publication of open, transparent research. Recent developments such as the publication of the OCLC report "The Archival Advantage: Integrating Archival Expertise into Management of Born-digital Library Materials", and the creation of the Research Data Alliance Interest Group Archives and Records Professionals for Research Data indicates that research data is, or can be, within the remit of records professionals. This paper represents a snapshot of contemporary and historical attitudes towards research data and recordkeeping and thus contributes to this emerging area of discussion.
机译:目的-本文的目的是就研究数据与记录之间的关系以及记录保存与研究数据管理之间的关系探索各种观点。设计/方法/方法-本文讨论研究数据管理领域的文献,作​​为作者对该主题的博士研究的初步工作的一部分。评论中包括的文献反映了有关研究数据管理和保存的当代和历史观点。调查结果-初步调查结果表明,记录专业人员从20世纪初开始就参与了研究数据的管理和保存。在文献中,研究数据被描述为与记录具有可比性,并且记录专业人员被公认为具有适用于研究数据管理的技能和专长。记录专业人员是致力于研究数据管理的众多专业之一。但是,他们目前不被认为是研究数据管理实践的领导者。原创性/价值-研究数据管理是一个新兴的挑战,因为研究生命周期中的利益相关者越来越多地要求公开,透明的研究出版。 OCLC报告“档案优势:将档案专业知识整合到出生的数字图书馆资料的管理中”的最新动态,以及研究数据联盟兴趣小组档案和记录专业人士的创建表明研究数据是最新的发展。 ,或者可以在记录专业人员的职权范围内。本文代表了对研究数据和记录保存的当代和历史态度的快照,因此有助于这一新兴的讨论领域。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号