...
首页> 外文期刊>Rail >New line remains a necessity, but benefits must be explained
【24h】

New line remains a necessity, but benefits must be explained

机译:换行仍然是必要的,但必须说明收益

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

DOUGLAS Oakervee's much-leaked and long-awaited review into High Speed 2 finally saw daylight on February 11, as Prime Minister Boris Johnson announced that the project was going ahead. Oakervee's work runs to 130 pages, with its most important recommendation being that the line from London to Birmingham be built in its entirety beyond to Manchester and Leeds. And his report concludes that the original rationale for HS2 still holds. "There is a need for greater capacity and reliability on the GB rail network as a whole," it says. Furthermore, it notes that there are no shovel-ready alternatives, saying that if HS2 were to be cancelled "many years of planning work would be required to identify, design and develop new proposals".
机译:在总理鲍里斯·约翰逊(Boris Johnson)宣布该项目正在进行之际,道格拉斯·奥克维尔(Douglas Oakervee)对高速2进行了漫长而期待已久的审查,终于在2月11日看到了曙光。 Oakervee的著作长达130页,最重要的建议是,从伦敦到伯明翰的铁路线应全部建成,直至曼彻斯特和利兹。他的报告得出结论,HS2的原始原理仍然成立。它说:“需要整体上提高GB铁路网络的容量和可靠性。”此外,它指出没有铁锹准备就绪的替代方案,并说如果要取消HS2,“将需要很多年的规划工作来确定,设计和制定新的建议”。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Rail 》 |2020年第899期| 34-35| 共2页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号