首页> 外文期刊>Queueing systems >Dynamic scheduling with reconfiguration delays
【24h】

Dynamic scheduling with reconfiguration delays

机译:具有重新配置延迟的动态调度

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

We consider scheduling in networks with interference constraints and reconfiguration delays, which may be incurred when one service schedule is dropped and a distinct service schedule is adopted. Reconfiguration delays occur in a variety of communication settings, such as satellite, optical, or delay-tolerant networks. In the absence of reconfiguration delays it is well known that the celebrated Max-Weight scheduling algorithm guarantees throughput optimality without requiring any knowledge of arrival rates. As we will show, however, the Max-Weight algorithm may fail to achieve throughput optimality in case of nonzero reconfiguration delays. Motivated by the latter issue, we propose a class of adaptive scheduling algorithms which persist with the current schedule until a certain stopping criterion is reached, before switching to the next schedule. While earlier proposed Variable Frame-Based Max-Weight (VFMW) policies belong to this class, we also present Switching-Curve-Based (SCB) policies that are more adaptive to bursts in arrivals. We develop novel Lyapunov drift techniques to prove that this class of algorithms under certain conditions achieves throughput optimality by dynamically adapting the durations of the interswitching intervals. Numerical results demonstrate that these algorithms significantly outperform the ordinary Max-Weight algorithm, and that SCB policies yield a better delay performance than VFMW policies.
机译:我们考虑在具有干扰约束和重新配置延迟的网络中进行调度,当一个服务调度被丢弃而采用不同的服务调度时,可能会发生这种调度。重新配置延迟发生在各种通信设置中,例如卫星,光或延迟容忍的网络。在没有重新配置延迟的情况下,众所周知的是,著名的Max-Weight调度算法可确保吞吐量最优,而无需任何到达速率的知识。正如我们将要显示的那样,在非零重新配置延迟的情况下,Max-Weight算法可能无法实现吞吐量的最优性。受后一问题的启发,我们提出了一类自适应调度算法,该算法在切换到下一个调度表之前,会与当前调度表保持一致,直到达到某个停止标准为止。虽然较早提出的基于可变帧的最大权重(VFMW)策略属于此类,但我们还提出了基于交换曲线(SCB)的策略,该策略更适应到达突发。我们开发了新颖的Lyapunov漂移技术,以证明此类算法在一定条件下可通过动态调整交换间隔的持续时间来实现吞吐量优化。数值结果表明,这些算法明显优于普通的Max-Weight算法,并且SCB策略比VFMW策略具有更好的延迟性能。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号