...
【24h】

DO WE NEED A PEM RELIABILITY MODEL?

机译:我们需要PEM可靠性模型吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Reliability prediction models for microcircuits have been a function of steady state temperature. Failure rates generated from accelerated temperature tests were extrapolated to predict system reliability at system use temperatures. This is now known to be completely inaccurate. Attempts are now being made to predict the reliability of plastic-encapsulated microcircuits(PAMs)based on accelerated temperature/humidity testing. Failure rates generated owing to corrosion failure mechanisms at these high stress levels are then extrapolated and used to predict system reliability at use temperature/humidity conditions. This paper discusses the fallacy of this approach. A new concept for assurance of PEM corrosion resistance is proposed. It will be shown that today's best commercial practice suppliers have already addressed the design, materials and processing issues of molded packaged microcircuits, and corrosion is no longer a mechanism of concern to the user.
机译:微电路的可靠性预测模型一直是稳态温度的函数。外推加速温度测试产生的故障率,以预测系统使用温度下的系统可靠性。现在已知这是完全不准确的。现在正在尝试基于加速的温度/湿度测试来预测塑料封装微电路(PAM)的可靠性。然后推断出在这些高应力水平下由于腐蚀失效机理而产生的失效率,并用于预测在使用温度/湿度条件下的系统可靠性。本文讨论了这种方法的谬误。提出了一种确保PEM耐腐蚀性的新概念。可以证明,当今最佳的商业惯例供应商已经解决了模制封装微电路的设计,材料和加工问题,并且腐蚀不再是用户关注的机制。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号