首页> 外文期刊>Quality and Reliability Engineering International >Reliability Forecasting of a Load-Haul-Dump Machine: A Comparative Study of ARIMA and Neural Networks
【24h】

Reliability Forecasting of a Load-Haul-Dump Machine: A Comparative Study of ARIMA and Neural Networks

机译:甩负荷机的可靠性预测:ARIMA和神经网络的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Both the autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA or the Box-Jenkins technique) and artificial neural networks (ANNs) are viable alternatives to the traditional reliability analysis methods (e.g., Weibull analysis, Poisson processes, non-homogeneous Poisson processes, and Markov methods). Time series analysis of the times between failures (TBFs) via ARIMA or ANNs does not have the limitations of the traditional methods such as requirements/assumptions of a priori postulation and/or statistically independent and identically distributed observations for TBFs. The reliability of an LHD unit was investigated by analysis of TBFs. Seasonal autoregressive integrated moving average (SARIMA) was employed for both modeling and forecasting the failures. The results were compared with a genetic algorithm-based (ANNs) model. An optimal ARIMA model, after a Box-Cox transformation of the cumulative TBFs, outperformed ANNs in forecasting the LHD's TBFs. Copyright (c) 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
机译:自回归综合移动平均值(ARIMA或Box-Jenkins技术)和人工神经网络(ANN)都是传统可靠性分析方法(例如Weibull分析,泊松过程,非均匀泊松过程和马尔可夫方法)的可行替代方案。通过ARIMA或ANN进行故障间隔时间(TBF)的时间序列分析没有传统方法的局限性,例如先验假设的要求/假设和/或TBF的统计独立且分布均匀的观测值。通过对TBF的分析研究了LHD装置的可靠性。季节性自回归综合移动平均值(SARIMA)用于建模和预测故障。将结果与基于遗传算法(ANN)的模型进行比较。在对累积TBF进行Box-Cox变换后,最优ARIMA模型在预测LHD的TBF方面优于人工神经网络。版权所有(c)2015 John Wiley&Sons,Ltd.

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号