首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: an international journal >Environmental SMOs and resource mobilization in the post-communist vs the Northwest European context
【24h】

Environmental SMOs and resource mobilization in the post-communist vs the Northwest European context

机译:后共产主义与西北欧洲背景下的环境SMO和资源动员

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

Purpose - This paper focuses on differences in resource mobilization opportunities among environmental social movement organizations (ESMOs), with empirical focus on ESMOs from five European Union countries - two Northwest European countries (Sweden, Germany) and three post-communist countries (Poland, Croatia, and Slovenia). Whereas mass-membership mobilization is a reality in the Northwest European context, ESMOs from post-communist countries fundamentally rely on international support and project-based funding. The purpose of this paper is to demonstrate and discuss what implications this difference has for domestic capacity building among ESMOs. Design/methodology/approach - The paper draws theoretically and empirically on literature on social movements, including environmental movements. It uses a qualitative methodology with figures, field observations, and interview data from ESMO representatives. The empirical material is based on field studies of ESMOs from the five focused countries. Findings - The findings demonstrate strong pessimism regarding the possibilities for mass-membership mobilization in the post-communist context, and indicate a set of challenges related to the strong reliance on project funding and international sources. Issues such as short-termism, lack of independence, critical distance, and learning potential are discussed. The findings also indicate avenues for creativity and how various buffers can help to cope with challenges, and that ESMOs from the Northwest European context also face pressures relating to resource mobilization that can negatively affect their critical edge. Originality/value - By the chosen focus and comparative approach, the paper contributes to our understanding if and how ESMOs can work as powerful and critical political actors in various contexts. The paper thus contributes theoretically and empirically to literature on social movements, and specifically environmental movements.
机译:目的-本文着重于环境社会运动组织(ESMO)之间资源动员机会的差异,以经验为重点来自五个欧盟国家(两个北欧国家(瑞典,德国)和三个后共产主义国家(波兰,克罗地亚)的ESMO)和斯洛文尼亚)。尽管在北欧国家已经实现了大规模成员动员,但来自后共产主义国家的ESMO基本上依靠国际支持和基于项目的资金。本文的目的是演示和讨论这种差异对ESMO之间的国内能力建设有何影响。设计/方法/方法-本文从理论和经验上借鉴了有关社会运动(包括环境运动)的文献。它使用定性方法,包括来自ESMO代表的数字,实地观察和采访数据。经验材料基于来自五个重点国家的ESMO的实地研究。调查结果-调查结果显示出对后共产主义背景下动员群众的可能性的强烈悲观情绪,并表明了与强烈依赖项目资金和国际资源有关的一系列挑战。讨论了诸如短期主义,缺乏独立性,临界距离和学习潜力等问题。研究结果还表明了创造力的途径以及各种缓冲如何帮助应对挑战,并且来自西北欧的ESMO也面临着与资源动员有关的压力,这些压力可能对其关键优势产生负面影响。原创性/价值-通过选择重点和比较方法,本文有助于我们理解ESMO是否以及如何在各种情况下作为强大而关键的政治角色发挥作用。因此,本文在理论和经验上为有关社会运动,特别是环境运动的文献做出了贡献。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号