...
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative Research in Organizations and Management: An International Journal >Introducing strong structuration theory for informing qualitative case studies in organization, management and accounting research
【24h】

Introducing strong structuration theory for informing qualitative case studies in organization, management and accounting research

机译:引入强大的结构化理论,以在组织,管理和会计研究中为定性案例研究提供信息

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Purpose – The aim of this paper is to present a reinforced version of structuration theory, known as strong structuration theory, set out in Stones as a disciplined approach to qualitative case study research in the organization, management and accounting fields. This framework challenges the belief held by certain critics that structuration theory cannot be used in substantive empirical research but is only a sensitising device or analytical tool. Design/methodology/approach – A conceptual discussion is the approach of the paper. Findings – The key concepts of strong structuration theory are outlined and then put in the context first of two attempts to apply the framework to empirical research and second of two recent papers which address theoretically informed qualitative research and the use of structuration theory in IT studies. Research limitations/implications – There are some limitations of this paper. The framework offered was not used to set the original research questions in the two case studies employed as these cases were conducted before the publication of Stones' book in 2005. Also, as weaknesses in the framework can best be assessed using empirical findings, a full evaluation cannot be carried out until such research is undertaken. Originality/value – This paper draws on recent research and thinking in sociology that have yet to be brought into case studies in the fields of accounting and management in particular.
机译:目的–本文的目的是提出一种结构化理论的增强版本,即强结构化理论,在Stones中进行了阐述,作为组织,管理和会计领域定性案例研究的一种规范方法。这个框架挑战了某些批评家的信念,即结构化理论不能用于实质性的实证研究,而只是一种敏感的工具或分析工具。设计/方法/方法-概念性讨论是本文的方法。研究结果–概述了强大的结构化理论的关键概念,然后将其放在上下文中,这是将框架应用于经验研究的两次尝试中的第一项,以及最近的两篇针对理论上定性研究以及在IT研究中使用结构化理论的论文的第二篇。研究局限性/含义-本文有一些局限性。所提供的框架并未用于所用的两个案例研究中的原始研究问题,因为这些案例是在2005年Stones的书出版之前进行的。此外,由于可以使用经验结果来最好地评估框架中的弱点,因此在进行此类研究之前,无法进行评估。原创性/价值–本文借鉴了社会学方面的最新研究和思想,这些研究和思想尚未纳入特别是会计和管理领域的案例研究中。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号