...
首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative research journal >Respecting recovery: research relationships with people with mental illness
【24h】

Respecting recovery: research relationships with people with mental illness

机译:尊重康复:与精神疾病患者的研究关系

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Purpose - The lived experience of individuals who experience mental illness should be at the heart of recovery-orientated practice and research. The purpose of this paper is to outline key ethical and practical issues that both respect principles of recovery and are fundamental to establishing and maintaining a research relationship with people with severe mental illness (SMI). Design/methodology/approach - Theoretical frameworks of recovery, discourse ethics and critical reflexivity were used in a 12-month longitudinal community study to construct and build methodology to inform the collection of rich descriptive data through informal discussions, observations and interviews. Detailed field notes and a reflective journal were used to enable critical reflexivity and challenge normative assumptions based on clinical and lay views of SMI. Findings - The paper provides an analysis through three vignettes which demonstrate how the principles of recovery were incorporated in an ethically grounded research relationship. Research limitations/implications - The study may have been limited by the small sample size of participants. Practical implications - Aspects of the research methodology may potentially be adopted by researchers working with people who experience SMI or with other hard-to-reach groups. Originality/value - As more research is undertaken with individuals who experience SMI, stigma around understandings of mental illness can be broken down by supporting individuals to find their voice through recovery orientated discourse ethics.
机译:目的-患有精神疾病的人的生活经验应成为以恢复为导向的实践和研究的核心。本文的目的是概述关键的伦理和实践问题,这些问题既要尊重康复原则,又是与严重精神疾病(SMI)建立和维持研究关系的基础。设计/方法/方法-在为期12个月的纵向社区研究中,使用了恢复,话语伦理和批判反思的理论框架,以构建和构建方法,以通过非正式的讨论,观察和访谈来收集丰富的描述性数据。基于SMI的临床和非专业观点,使用了详细的现场说明和反思性期刊来启用批判性反思和挑战规范性假设。调查结果-本文通过三个短片进行了分析,这些短片展示了如何将恢复原则纳入基于道德的研究关系中。研究的局限性/意义-研究可能受到参与者样本量较小的限制。实际意义-与有SMI经验的人或其他难以接触的群体一起工作的研究人员可能会采用研究方法的各个方面。原创性/价值-随着对经历过SMI的个人进行的更多研究,可以通过支持个人通过面向恢复的话语伦理来找到自己的声音,来消除对精神疾病理解的污名。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号