首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative research journal >'Underdiscussed, underused and underreported': pilot work in team-based qualitative research
【24h】

'Underdiscussed, underused and underreported': pilot work in team-based qualitative research

机译:“讨论不足,使用不足和报告不足”:基于团队的定性研究的试点工作

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose - The authors, with disparate organisational affiliations and in different geographic locations, worked together on a qualitative multiple-case study of ad hoc supervisory encounters between general practice (GP) supervisors and GP-registrars. The purpose of this paper is to share our experiences and learning to highlight how valuable pilot work can be when conducting team-based qualitative research. Design/methodology/approach - This paper outlines the value of pilot work in consolidating whole team understanding of the research plan, using our experiences as an example. We first offer a synthesis of published literature relating to pilot work, especially in qualitative research approaches. Next, we outline and justify the pilot work undertaken for the ad hoc supervision study. Lastly, we use each researcher's voice to describe our experiences and then share the lessons we learned undertaking pilot work in qualitative research. Findings - We found that while pilot work can be useful in refining strategies, data collection processes and analytic instruments. There are further benefits in galvanising whole team understanding of the research plan, in encouraging reflexivity, in ensuring transparency of the research process, and for ethical considerations. Originality/value - There are few published papers or books which offer researchers guidance regarding pilot work, especially within a qualitative paradigm. Our experience shows there is value in planning and conducting pilot work. We believe others may benefit from our experience as they embark on team-based research.
机译:目的-作者具有不同的组织隶属关系,并且在不同的地理位置,共同进行了多案例研究,对全科医师(GP)主管和GP注册服务商之间的临时监督进行了定性研究。本文的目的是分享我们的经验和学习,以突出进行基于团队的定性研究时飞行员工作的价值。设计/方法/方法-本文以我们的经验为例,概述了试点工作在巩固整个团队对研究计划的理解方面的价值。我们首先提供有关试点工作,特别是定性研究方法方面的已出版文献的综述。接下来,我们概述并论证为临时监督研究进行的试点工作。最后,我们使用每个研究人员的声音来描述我们的经验,然后分享在定性研究中进行试点工作所学到的经验教训。调查结果-我们发现试点工作对于完善策略,数据收集过程和分析工具很有用。在激发整个团队对研究计划的理解,鼓励反思,确保研究过程的透明度以及出于道德考虑方面,还有其他好处。原创性/价值-很少有发表的论文或书籍为研究人员提供有关试验工作的指南,尤其是在定性范式内。我们的经验表明,规划和开展试点工作具有价值。我们相信其他人在进行基于团队的研究时可能会从我们的经验中受益。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Qualitative research journal》 |2016年第4期|314-330|共17页
  • 作者单位

    Murray City Country Coast General Practice Training, Warrnambool, Australia and Deakin University, Warrnambool Campus, Australia;

    Murray City Country Coast General Practice Training, Warrnambool, Australia and Deakin University, Warrnambool Campus, Australia;

    Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia and Department of Surgery (Austin), University of Melbourne, Australia;

    Eastern Victoria General Practice Training, Churchill, Australia and Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University, Clayton, Australia;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    Pilot; Qualitative research; Reflexivity; Teamwork; Research team; Pilot study; Pilot work;

    机译:飞行员;定性研究;反身性;团队合作;研究团队;试验研究;试点工作;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号