首页> 外文期刊>Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management >Sustainable “what”? A cognitive approach to understanding sustainable development
【24h】

Sustainable “what”? A cognitive approach to understanding sustainable development

机译:可持续的“什么”?一种认识可持续发展的认知方法

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to explore the meaning of sustainable development held by New Zealand “thought leaders” and “influencers” promoting sustainability, business, or sustainable business. It seeks to compare inductively derived worldviews with theories associated with sustainability and the humanity-nature relationship. Design/methodology/approach – Worldviews were explored through a cognitive mapping exercise. A total of 21 thought leaders and influencers constructed maps of their understanding of sustainable development. These maps were analysed to reveal commonalities and differences. Findings – Participant maps illustrated disparate levels of detail and complexity. Those participants promoting business generally emphasized the economic domain, accepting economic growth and development as the key to sustainable development. An emphasis on the environmental domain, the future, limits to the Earth's resources, and achievement through various radical means, was more commonly articulated by those promoting sustainability. Participants promoting sustainable business held elements of both approaches, combining an emphasis on the environmental domain and achievement of sustainable development by various reformist means. Research limitations/implications – This study identified the range of worldviews expressed by 21 thought leaders and influencers across three main domains only – promoters of sustainability, business or both. Extending this sample and exploring how these and other views arise and are represented within a wider population could be the subject of further research. Practical implications – Such divergence of opinion as to what connotes sustainable development across even a small sample does not bode well for its achievement. The elucidation of the worldview of promoters of sustainable business points to the need to consider more carefully the implications of environmentalism, and other aspects of sustainability, integrated into a business agenda. Originality/value – This paper contributes to empirical research on environmental worldviews which has barely penetrated discussion of sustainability within the management and business literature. It shows cognitive mapping to be an effective technique for investigating the meaning of a conceptual theme like sustainable development.
机译:目的–本文的目的是探讨新西兰“思想领袖”和“影响者”所持的促进可持续性,商业或可持续商业的意义。它试图将归纳的世界观与与可持续性以及人与自然关系相关的理论进行比较。设计/方法/方法–通过认知映射练习探索了世界观。共有21位思想领袖和影响者绘制了他们对可持续发展理解的地图。分析这些地图以揭示共性和差异。调查结果–参与者地图说明了不同程度的细节和复杂性。那些促进业务的参与者普遍强调经济领域,认为经济增长和发展是可持续发展的关键。那些强调可持续性的人更普遍地强调了环境领域,未来,对地球资源的限制以及通过各种激进手段取得的成就。促进可持续企业发展的参与者将这两种方法结合在一起,将重点放在环境领域和通过各种改良主义手段实现可持续发展上。研究的局限性/意义–本研究仅确定了21个思想领袖和影响者在三个主要领域(可持续性,商业或两者的推动者)表达的世界观范围。扩展此样本并探索这些观点和其他观点如何在更广泛的人群中出现并得到代表可能是进一步研究的主题。实际意义–即使在很小的样本范围内,对于可持续发展的看法分歧也很大,这对实现这一目标并不是一个好兆头。对可持续商业促进者世界观的阐释表明,有必要更仔细地考虑将环境主义的含义以及可持续发展的其他方面纳入企业议程的含义。独创性/价值–本文对环境世界观的实证研究做出了贡献,而这在管理和商业文献中几乎没有渗透到关于可持续性的讨论中。它表明认知映射是研究诸如可持续发展之类的概念主题含义的有效技术。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号