首页> 外文期刊>Publius: The Journal of Federalism >Institutional Resilience Meets Critical Junctures: (re)allocation of Power in Three British Parties Post-devolution
【24h】

Institutional Resilience Meets Critical Junctures: (re)allocation of Power in Three British Parties Post-devolution

机译:制度弹性遇到关键时刻:权力下放后三个英国政党的(重新)权力分配

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

How do parties react when their institutional environment is federalized or devolved? This article investigates how the three dominant British parties have responded to devolution in terms of internal reallocation of power. Party change is evaluated in the light of a functionalist and an institutionalist perspective. We find that Labour has moved incrementally away from centralism; the Conservative Party has changed more extensively towards stratarchy, while the Liberal Democrats, already federalized pre-devolution, have been the least affected of the parties. Our findings lend some support to the institutionalist thesis that (functionally driven) party change is restrained by distinct organizational legacies. However, critical junctures, typically induced by electoral failure, could facilitate a party’s break with organizational legacies to embark on more extensive reform.
机译:当政党的联邦制或权力下放时,政党如何反应?本文研究了英国的三个主要政党如何根据内部权力重新分配对权力下放作出反应。党的变革是从功能主义和制度主义的角度来评估的。我们发现,工党已逐渐摆脱集中制。保守党已经向strastrachy进行了更广泛的改变,而已经联邦化的权力下放的自由民主党在各党派中受影响最小。我们的发现为制度主义的论点提供了一些支持,即(功能驱动)政党更迭受到独特的组织遗产的制约。但是,通常由选举失败引起的关键时刻,可能会促使政党打破组织遗产,着手进行更广泛的改革。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号