...
首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >The prostate cancer screening debate: public reaction to medical controversy in the media
【24h】

The prostate cancer screening debate: public reaction to medical controversy in the media

机译:前列腺癌筛查辩论:媒体对医疗争议的公众反应

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

This study explored older men's and their partners' reactions to a television news program on the medical debate surrounding the use of the prostate-specific antigen (PSA) test for prostate cancer screening. Six focus groups, split by gender and socio-economic status (SES), were conducted with men aged 50 years or older (n -28) and female partners of such men (n = 13). A self-completion questionnaire was also used to yield quantitative indices. In general, viewers appeared to appreciate from the debate that there was controversy surrounding prostate cancer screening, and they recognized that PSA testing is more applicable to certain subgroups of men. Although there were differences by SES and gender, the results suggest that exposing health consumers to medical uncertainty and "expert" conflict can help raise awareness of the issue and complexities involved. However, there was evidence to suggest that health consumers may be better able to negotiate conflicting medical information if the different sides of the argument are plainly noted and a clear distinction is made between opinion and evidence. This study has broader relevance to the management of media coverage of medical controversies by public health organizations.
机译:这项研究探讨了老年男性及其伴侣对电视新闻节目的反应,有关医学辩论涉及使用前列腺特异性抗原(PSA)测试筛查前列腺癌。根据性别和社会经济地位(SES)划分了六个焦点小组,对象是50岁或以上的男性(n -28)和此类男性的女性伴侣(n = 13)。自我完成调查表也用于产生定量指标。总体而言,观众似乎从辩论中欣赏到围绕前列腺癌筛查存在争议,他们认识到PSA检测更适用于某些男性人群。尽管SES和性别存在差异,但结果表明,使医疗保健消费者承受医疗不确定性和“专家”冲突的影响,可以帮助提高人们对问题和复杂性的认识。但是,有证据表明,如果清楚地指出论点的不同方面,并且在观点和证据之间进行明确区分,则健康消费者可能更有能力协商有争议的医学信息。这项研究与公共卫生组织对医疗争议的媒体报道的管理有着广泛的联系。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号