...
首页> 外文期刊>Public understanding of science >Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions
【24h】

Citizen science as seen by scientists: Methodological, epistemological and ethical dimensions

机译:科学家看到的公民科学:方法论,认识论和伦理学方面

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Citizen science as a way of communicating science and doing public engagement has over the past decade become the focus of considerable hopes and expectations. It can be seen as a win-win situation, where scientists get help from the public and the participants get a public engagement experience that involves them in real and meaningful scientific research. In this paper we present the results of a series of qualitative interviews with scientists who participated in the 'OPAL' portfolio of citizen science projects that has been running in England since 2007: What were their experiences of participating in citizen science? We highlight two particular sets of issues that our participants have voiced, methodological/epistemological and ethical issues. While we share the general enthusiasm over citizen science, we hope that the research in this paper opens up more debate over the potential pitfalls of citizen science as seen by the scientists themselves.
机译:在过去的十年中,公民科学作为传播科学和进行公众参与的一种方式,已经成为人们寄予厚望和期望的焦点。这可以看作是双赢的局面,科学家从公众那里获得帮助,参与者获得公众参与的经验,使他们参与真实而有意义的科学研究。在本文中,我们介绍了对参与自2007年以来在英格兰运行的“ OPAL”公民科学项目组合的科学家进行的一系列定性采访的结果:他们参与公民科学的经历是什么?我们重点介绍了参与者提出的两类特殊问题,即方法论/流行病学和伦理学问题。尽管我们对公民科学抱有普遍热情,但我们希望本文中的研究能够为科学家本身所看到的关于公民科学的潜在陷阱开辟更多的辩论。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号