首页> 外文期刊>Public choice >Divided we vote
【24h】

Divided we vote

机译:除以我们投票

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Divided government is known to correlate with limited government, but less is understood about the empirical conditions that lead to divided government. This paper estimates the determinants of continuous and categorical measures of divided government in an empirical macro political economy model using 30 years of data from the American states. Voters support more divided government after increased government spending per dollar of tax revenues, but more unified government after worsening incomes and unemployment rates. Only conditional support is found for the strategic-moderating theory (Alesina and Rosenthal in Econometrica 64(6): 1311-1341, 1996) that focuses purely on midterm cycles and split-ticket voting absent economic conditions.
机译:众所周知,分裂政府与有限政府相关,但是对于导致分裂政府的经验条件了解得很少。本文使用来自美国各州的30年数据,估计了经验主义的宏观政治经济学模型中政府分裂的连续和分类措施的决定因素。在每美元税收收入增加政府支出后,选民支持更分裂的政府,但在收入和失业率恶化后,选民支持更统一的政府。仅对战略调节理论(Alesina和Rosenthal在Econometrica 64(6):1311-1341,1996年)中找到了条件支持,该理论仅关注中期周期和没有经济条件的两票制投票。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号