Game theory and the study of American political development

摘要

Game theoretic analyses of American institutions and American political development largely are disconnected enterprises, yet they share many points of contact and thus opportunities for fruitful exchange. In this essay I discuss the value and limits of formalization for the enterprise of institutional analysis that those fields have in common. I conceptualize two broad approaches that formal modelers have taken to study institutions-institutions as game forms, and institutions as equilibria-that have been relatively successful for understanding institutionalchoiceandstability. At the same time, formal modelers have been less successful in addressing institutionalchangeanddevelopment, topics about which APD has much to offer. Overall, I contend that crosstalk between the two fields can benefit them both.