首页> 外文期刊>Public choice >The prevalence and consequences of ballot truncation in ranked-choice elections
【24h】

The prevalence and consequences of ballot truncation in ranked-choice elections

机译:投票截断在排名选举中的患病率和后果

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In ranked-choice elections, voters vote by indicating their preference orderings over the candidates. A ballot is truncated when the ordering is incomplete (called partial voting). Sometimes truncation is forced-voters are allowed to rank only a limited number of candidates-but sometimes it is voluntary. During the vote tabulating process, a truncated ballot is exhausted when all of the candidates it ranks have been eliminated. Ballot exhaustion and, therefore ballot truncation, is a concern in single-winner elections when the margin of victory in the final stage is less than the number of exhausted ballots. That concern motivates our study. We review evidence from actual single-winner ranked-choice elections and conclude that voluntary ballot truncation is very common. Moreover, it is difficult to explain strategically. To assess the significance of ballot truncation, we simulate ranked-choice elections with four, five and six candidates, using both spatial and random models of voter preferences. Does truncation change the probability that a Condorcet winner wins the election? Does the winner change as the extent of truncation increases? We find that even small amounts of truncation can alter election outcomes.
机译:在排名选择选举中,选民通过表明他们的偏好排序给候选人来投票。当订购不完全(称为部分投票)时,投票被截断。有时截断是强迫选民的禁用只有有限数量的候选人 - 但有时它是自愿的。在投票表格过程中,当所有候选人都被淘汰时,截断的选票已经耗尽。投票疲惫,因此投票截断,是在最终阶段胜利的胜利率少于疲惫的选票的次数时关注单胜人选举。这令人担忧激励我们的研究。我们从实际的单胜者排名选择选举中审查证据,并得出结论,自愿投票截断非常普遍。而且,很难战略解释。为了评估投票截断的重要性,我们使用选民偏好的空间和随机模型来模拟四个,五个和六个候选者的排名选举。 Does truncation change the probability that a Condorcet winner wins the election?截断程度是否增加了胜利者的变化?我们发现即使少量的截断也会改变选举结果。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号