...
首页> 外文期刊>Psychological Research >Having to identify a target reduces latencies in prosaccades but not in antisaccades
【24h】

Having to identify a target reduces latencies in prosaccades but not in antisaccades

机译:必须确定目标可以减少侦察的等待时间,但不能减少侦察的等待时间

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

In a princeps study, Trottier and Pratt (2005) showed that saccadic latencies were dramatically reduced when subjects were instructed to not simply look at a peripheral target (reflexive saccade) but to identify some of its properties. According to the authors, the shortening of saccadic reactions times may arise from a top-down disinhibition of the superior colliculus (SC), potentially mediated by the direct pathway connecting frontal/prefrontal cortex structures to the SC. Using a “cue paradigm” (a cue preceded the appearance of the target), the present study tests if the task instruction (Identify vs. Glance) also reduces the latencies of antisaccades (AS), which involve prefrontal structures. We show that instruction reduces latencies for prosaccade but not for AS. An AS requires two processes: the inhibition of a reflexive saccade and the generation of a voluntary saccade. To separate these processes and to better understand the task effect we also test the effect of the task instruction only on voluntary saccades. The effect still exists but it is much weaker than for reflexive saccades. The instruction effect closely depends on task demands in executive resources.
机译:在princeps研究中,Trottier和Pratt(2005)表明,当指示受试者不仅仅观察周围目标(反射性扫视)而是识别其某些特性时,眼跳潜伏期会大大减少。这组作者说,眼部反应时间的缩短可能是由上丘顶(SC)的自上而下的抑制作用引起的,这可能是由额叶/前额叶皮层结构连接到SC的直接途径介导的。本研究使用“提示范例”(提示出现在目标出现之前)来测试任务指令(“识别”与“扫视”)是否也减少了涉及前额叶结构的反扫视(AS)的潜伏期。我们表明,指令减少了催促的延迟,但没有减少AS的延迟。一个自治系统需要两个过程:反身扫视的抑制和自愿扫视的产生。为了分离这些过程并更好地理解任务效果,我们还仅测试了任务指导对自愿扫视的效果。效果仍然存在,但比反射性扫视要弱得多。指令效果密切取决于执行人员资源中的任务要求。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号