首页> 外文期刊>Psychological medicine >Diagnostic co-morbidity in 2300 psychiatric out-patients presenting for treatment evaluated with a semi-structured diagnostic interview
【24h】

Diagnostic co-morbidity in 2300 psychiatric out-patients presenting for treatment evaluated with a semi-structured diagnostic interview

机译:半结构化诊断访谈评估了2300名就诊的精神科门诊患者的合并症

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Background. The largest clinical epidemiological surveys of psychiatric disorders have been based on unstructured clinical evaluations. However, several recent studies have questioned the accuracy and thoroughness of clinical diagnostic interviews; consequently, clinical epidemiological studies, like community-based studies, should be based on standardized evaluations. The Rhode Island Methods to Improve Diagnostic Assessment and Services (MIDAS) project is the largest clinical epidemiological study using semi-structured interviews assessing a wide range of psychiatric disorders conducted in a general clinical out-patient practice. In the present report we examined the frequency of DSM-IV Axis I diagnostic co-morbidity in psychiatric out-patients. Method. A total of 2300 out-patients were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID) upon presentation for treatment. Results. The mean number of current and lifetime DSM-IV Axis I disorders in the 2300 patients was 1.9 (s.d. = 1.5) and 3.0 (s.d. = 1.8) respectively. The majority of patients were diagnosed with two or more current disorders, and more than one-third were diagnosed with three or more current disorders. Examination of the most frequent current disorders in the patients with the 12 most common principal diagnoses indicated that the pattern of co-morbidity differed among the disorders. The highest mean number of current co-morbid disorders was found for patients with a principal diagnosis of post-traumatic stress disorder and bipolar disorder. Conclusions. Clinicians should assume that psychiatric patients presenting for treatment have more than one current diagnosis. The pattern of co-morbidity varies according to the principal diagnosis.
机译:背景。精神疾病的最大的临床流行病学调查是基于非结构化的临床评估。但是,最近的一些研究对临床诊断访谈的准确性和彻底性提出了质疑。因此,像基于社区的研究一样,临床流行病学研究应基于标准化的评估。罗德岛州改善诊断评估和服务方法(MIDAS)项目是最大的临床流行病学研究,使用半结构化访谈来评估在一般临床门诊实践中进行的各种精神疾病。在本报告中,我们检查了精神科门诊患者DSM-IV轴I诊断合并症的频率。方法。共有2300名门诊患者在就诊时接受了DSM-IV结构化临床访谈(SCID)。结果。在2300名患者中,当前和终生DSM-IV Axis I疾病的平均数分别为1.9(标准差= 1.5)和3.0(标准差= 1.8)。大多数患者被诊断出患有两种或多种当前疾病,三分之一以上被诊断出患有三种或多种当前疾病。对具有12种最常见的主要诊断的患者中最常见的当前疾病进行的检查表明,各种疾病之间的合并症模式有所不同。对于主要诊断为创伤后应激障碍和双相情感障碍的患者,发现当前的合并症最高。结论。临床医生应假定正在接受治疗的精神病患者当前有不止一种诊断。合并症的类型根据主要诊断而有所不同。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号