...
首页> 外文期刊>PROSPECTS >School autonomy and accountability in Thailand: Does the gap between policy intent and implementation matter?
【24h】

School autonomy and accountability in Thailand: Does the gap between policy intent and implementation matter?

机译:泰国的学校自主权和问责制:政策意图与实施之间的差距重要吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

This article contrasts policy intent and policy implementation in school autonomy and accountability. The analysis uses a conceptual framework based on the interaction between school autonomy, student assessment, and accountability as elements of a closed system. The article analyzes the implementation of school autonomy and accountability policy, using data collected from 226 schools in Thailand that participated in the 2009 PISA survey. To understand how autonomy and accountability relate to student achievement, the study estimates a linear regression with PISA reading achievement as the dependent variable and indicators of autonomy and accountability (and control variables) as the independent variables. The estimates suggest that students at schools exercising a higher level of operational autonomy than the level ascribed by regulation tend to have PISA reading scores 6.0–8.6 points higher than students at schools that behave less autonomously. These results are consistent with other research findings.
机译:本文在学校自治和问责制方面对比了政策意图和政策实施。该分析使用基于学校自治,学生评估和问责制之间相互作用的概念框架,作为封闭系统的组成部分。本文利用从参与2009年PISA调查的泰国226所学校收集的数据中分析了学校自主权和责任制的实施情况。为了理解自主性和责任感与学生成绩之间的关系,本研究估计了线性回归,其中PISA阅读成绩为因变量,自主性和责任感(及控制变量)指标为自变量。估计表明,与规定较轻的学生相比,行使操作自主权的学校学生的PISA阅读分数往往高出6.0-8.6点。这些结果与其他研究结果一致。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号