首页> 外文期刊>Property Week >Professional Advice
【24h】

Professional Advice

机译:专业建议

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Probably not. Where a lease of commercial or residential premises includes a list of items that a tenant has covenanted to pay, and that list makes no reference to the landlord being able to charge a management fee, then it is unlikely that the tenant would have to pay those fees.This is because of a principle known as the 'expressio unius est exclusio alterius' rule. The rule asserts that, where there is a general assumption that if the parties had determined a comprehensive list of the items that would be in the service charge, then it will be assumed that those items not coming within that list of items were determined to be excluded.If, on the other hand, there are no items listed on the lease, then it may be possible for the landlord to rely on a statutory definition of service charges for residential leases - which are sometimes used for commercial leases -with a minor amendment.
机译:可能不会。商业或住宅房屋的租赁包括租户已达成支付的物品清单,并且该清单不提及房东能够收取管理费,但租户不太可能需要支付这些费用。这是因为称为“Expressio Unius Est Exclusius Alterius”规则的原则。该规则声称,如果缔约方确定了缔约方已确定在服务费中的项目全面清单,那么将假设未在该项目清单中确定的项目是确定的被排除在外。另一方面,如果租约没有列出的物品,那么房东可能依赖于住宅租赁的服务费的法定定义 - 有时用于商业租赁 - 在轻微的修正案中。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Property Week》 |2008年第16期|104|共1页
  • 作者

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号