首页> 外文期刊>Progress in Energy and Combustion Science >Advanced models of fuel droplet heating and evaporation
【24h】

Advanced models of fuel droplet heating and evaporation

机译:燃油滴加热和蒸发的高级模型

获取原文
       

摘要

Recent developments in modelling the heating and evaporation of fuel droplets are reviewed, and unsolved problems are identified. It is noted that modelling transient droplet heating using steady-state correlations for the convective heat transfer coefficient can be misleading. At the initial stage of heating stationary droplets, the well known steady-state result Nu=2 leads to under prediction of the rate of heating, while at the final stage the same result leads to over prediction. The numerical analysis of droplet heating using the effective thermal conductivity model can be based on the analytical solution of the heat conduction equation inside the droplet. This approach was shown to have clear advantages compared with the approach based on the numerical solution of the same equation both from the point of view of accuracy and computer efficiency. When highly accurate calculations are not required, but CPU time economy is essential then the effect of finite thermal conductivity and re-circulation in droplets can be taken into account using the so called parabolic model. For practical applications in computation fluid dynamics (CFD) codes the simplified model for radiative heating, describing the average droplet absorption efficiency factor, appears to be the most useful both from the point of view of accuracy and CPU efficiency. Models describing the effects of multi-component droplets need to be considered when modelling realistic fuel droplet heating and evaporation. However, most of these models are still rather complicated, which limits their wide application in CFD codes. The Distillation Curve Model for multi-component droplets seems to be a reasonable compromise between accuracy and CPU efficiency. The systems of equations describing droplet heating and evaporation and autoignition of fuel vapour/air mixture in individual computational cells are stiff. Establishing hierarchy between these equations, and separate analysis of the equations for fast and slow variables may be a constructive way forward in analysing these systems.
机译:回顾了燃料液滴加热和蒸发建模的最新进展,并确定了未解决的问题。注意的是,使用稳态相关性对流传热系数对瞬态液滴加热进行建模可能会产生误导。在加热固定液滴的初始阶段,众所周知的稳态结果Nu = 2导致加热速率的预测不足,而在最终阶段,相同的结果导致过度预测。使用有效热导率模型对液滴加热进行的数值分析可以基于液滴内部热传导方程的解析解。从准确性和计算机效率的角度来看,与基于相同方程的数值解的方法相比,该方法具有明显的优势。如果不需要高精度的计算,但是必须节省CPU时间,那么可以使用所谓的抛物线模型来考虑有限的热导率和液滴的再循环。对于计算流体力学(CFD)编码的实际应用,从精度和CPU效率的角度来看,描述平均液滴吸收效率因子的辐射加热简化模型似乎是最有用的。在对实际的燃料滴加热和蒸发建模时,需要考虑描述多组分液滴影响的模型。但是,大多数模型仍然相当复杂,这限制了它们在CFD代码中的广泛应用。多组分液滴的蒸馏曲线模型似乎是精度和CPU效率之间的合理折衷。描述各个计算单元中的液滴加热和蒸发以及燃料蒸气/空气混合物的自动点火的方程式系统很严格。在这些方程式之间建立层次结构,并对快速变量和慢速变量分别进行方程式分析,可能是分析这些系统的建设性方法。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号