...
首页> 外文期刊>Professional safety >Problem Solving: Are Higher-Order Controls Ignored?
【24h】

Problem Solving: Are Higher-Order Controls Ignored?

机译:解决问题:高阶控件被忽略吗?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

The two null hypotheses have failed to be rejected. Incident causes, categorized as latent and active failures, identified through incident investigations have not changed over time. Solutions to OSH issues, categorized by the hierarchy of controls, identified through incident investigations also have not changed. The results show that risk-reduction recommendations in incident investigations are shifting slightly to include additional higher-order controls. Perhaps the NIOSH PTD initiative and a focus on ANSI Z10 and the hierarchy of controls are having some effect on problem solving.
机译:这两个无效假设未能被拒绝。通过事件调查确定的分类为潜在故障和活动故障的事件原因并未随时间变化。通过事件调查确定的按控制层次分类的OSH问题解决方案也没有改变。结果表明,事件调查中降低风险的建议略有变化,以包括其他更高级别的控制措施。也许NIOSH PTD计划以及对ANSI Z10和控件层次结构的关注对解决问题有一定影响。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Professional safety》 |2014年第2期|34-40|共7页
  • 作者

    Michael Behm; Demetria Powell;

  • 作者单位

    East Carolina University;

    University of North Carolina at Wilmington;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号