...
首页> 外文期刊>Production and operations management >Carbon Leakage: The Impact of Asymmetric Regulation on Carbon-Emitting Production
【24h】

Carbon Leakage: The Impact of Asymmetric Regulation on Carbon-Emitting Production

机译:碳渗漏:非对称调节对碳发射生产的影响

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Regions with carbon emission regulations bear the risk of "carbon leakage" if local producers shift production capacity to an unregulated region. We investigate the problem for a producer subject to geographically asymmetric emission regulation with uncertain future emission price. The producer has twoex anteoptions to lower its compliance cost: investing in clean production technology in the regulated region and building production capacity in the unregulated region. The producer determines its production quantitiesex post, after emission price uncertainty is resolved. We study two anti-leakage policies, Border Tax (BT) and Output-Based Allocation (OB), where the former adopts a "stick" approach that penalizes offshore production and the latter adopts a "carrot" approach that grants free emission allowances for production in the regulated region. First, we show that the emission price uncertainty can exert opposing effects in the absence of an anti-leakage policy: When the expected emission price is low (high), a higher uncertainty aggravates (mitigates) carbon leakage. Second, through a comprehensive comparison, we highlight that while both BT and OB are able to reduce carbon leakage, BT has a stronger effect in both the regulated and unregulated regions in multiple dimensions, especially when the carbon leakage risk is high. Third, we find that a higher emission price uncertainty weakens the effect of both BT and OB. We therefore suggest that emission price uncertainty should be accounted for when formulating anti-leakage policies. Finally, we extend our analysis to a competitive case and find that the superiority of BT relative to OB is enhanced.
机译:如果本地生产商将生产能力转移到一个不受管制的地区,则碳排放法规的区域承担了“碳泄漏”的风险。我们调查了生产者对未来排放价格不确定的地理上不对称排放监管的问题。该生产商具有双重替换,以降低其合规成本:投资于监管区域的清洁生产技术,并在不受管制的地区建设生产能力。生产者确定其生产量码邮报,在排放价格不确定性得到解决之后。我们研究了两个反泄漏政策,边界税(BT)和基于产出的分配(OB),前者采用了“棍子”方法,惩罚海上生产,后者采用“胡萝卜”方法,授予免费排放津贴在受监管区域的生产。首先,我们表明,在没有抗泄漏政策的情况下,排放价格不确定性可以发挥相反的效果:当预期的排放价格低(高)时,更高的不确定性加剧(减灾)碳泄漏。其次,通过全面的比较,我们突出显示,虽然BT和OB都能够减少碳泄漏,但BT在多维规则和未调节的区域中具有更强的效果,特别是当碳泄漏风险高时。第三,我们发现更高的排放价格不确定性削弱了BT和OB的效果。因此,我们建议在制定抗泄漏政策时应考虑排放价格不确定性。最后,我们将我们的分析扩展到竞争案例,并发现BT相对于ob的优越性得到了增强。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号