首页> 外文期刊>Production and operations management >Stabilized-Cycle Strategy for Capacitated Lot Sizing with Multiple Products: Fill-Rate Constraints in Rolling Schedules
【24h】

Stabilized-Cycle Strategy for Capacitated Lot Sizing with Multiple Products: Fill-Rate Constraints in Rolling Schedules

机译:多种产品的批量生产的稳定周期策略:滚动计划中的填充率约束

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

In practice, deterministic, multi-period lot-sizing models are implemented in rolling schedules since this allows the revision of decisions beyond the frozen horizon. Thus, rolling schedules are able to take realizations and updated forecasts of uncertain data (e.g., customer demands) into account. Furthermore, it is common to hold safety stocks to ensure given service levels (e.g., fill rate). As we will show, this approach, implemented in rolling schedules, often results in increased setup and holding costs while (over-)accomplishing given fill rates. A well-known alternative to deterministic planning models are stochastic, static, multi-period planning models used in the static uncertainty strategy, which results in stable plans. However, these models have a lack of flexibility to react to the realization of uncertain data. As a result, actual costs may differ widely from planned costs, and downside deviations of actual fill rates from those given are very high. We propose a new strategy, namely the stabilized cycle. This combines and expands upon ideas from the literature for minimizing setup and holding costs in rolling schedules, while controlling actual product-specific fill rates for a finite reporting period. A computational study with a multi-item capacitated medium-term production planning model has been executed in rolling schedules. On the one hand, it demonstrates that the stabilized-cycle strategy yields a good compromise between costs and downside deviations. Furthermore, the stabilized-cycle strategy weakly dominates the order-based strategy for both constant and seasonal demands.
机译:在实践中,确定性的,多周期的批量模型是在滚动计划中实现的,因为这样可以修改超出冻结范围的决策。因此,滚动时间表能够考虑不确定数据(例如,客户需求)的实现和更新预测。此外,通常持有安全库存以确保给定的服务水平(例如填充率)。正如我们将显示的那样,这种在滚动时间表中实施的方法通常会导致设置和维护成本增加,同时(过度)完成给定的填充率。确定性计划模型的一个众所周知的替代方法是静态,不确定性策略中使用的随机,静态,多周期计划模型,从而可以实现稳定的计划。但是,这些模型缺乏对不确定数据实现的灵活性。结果,实际成本可能与计划成本相差很大,并且实际填充率与给定值的下行偏差非常大。我们提出了一种新的策略,即稳定周期。这结合并扩展了文献中的思想,以最大程度地减少滚动计划中的设置和保持成本,同时在有限的报告期内控制特定于产品的实际填充率。在滚动计划中执行了具有多项目能力的中期生产计划模型的计算研究。一方面,它表明稳定周期策略在成本和下行偏差之间取得了很好的折衷。此外,对于持续需求和季节性需求,稳定周期策略几乎无法主导基于订单的策略。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号