首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >Effectiveness of diabetes mellitus screening recommendations.
【24h】

Effectiveness of diabetes mellitus screening recommendations.

机译:糖尿病筛查有效性的建议。

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Screening guidelines proposed by the Expert Committee on the Diagnosis and Classification of Diabetes Mellitus have been endorsed by several medical societies. However, one-third of cases are undiagnosed, and complications at the time of diagnosis indicate that disease may have been present for several years before diagnosis. This study evaluates the effectiveness of the guidelines for detecting new cases of diabetes mellitus. By using a cross-sectional, representative sample of the United States (National Health and Nutritional Examination Survey, NHANES III), the guidelines are tested on adults, 20 years and older without a prior diagnosis of diabetes. Individuals are classified as nondiabetics (n = 6,241) or as having undiagnosed diabetes (n = 274) based on their blood glucose. Screening when one risk factor is present, as stated in the guidelines, has a true-positive rate of 100% and would require that 83% of the population be tested. Screening when two risk factors are present is more efficient, with a comparable true-positive rate (98%), but requires that only 59% of the population be tested. A notable finding is the earlier age of onset among minorities, which may be associated with other health disparities. Because diabetes occurs at younger ages in minorities, screening whites who are > or =40 and minorities > or =30 years of age has a high true-positive rate (95%) and also reduces testing (60%). The screening guidelines would be effective, if followed, and would essentially eliminate undiagnosed cases of diabetes.
机译:糖尿病诊断和分类专家委员会提出的筛查指南已得到数个医学学会的认可。但是,三分之一的病例未被诊断,诊断时的并发症表明疾病可能在诊断之前已经存在了几年。这项研究评估了指南在检测新糖尿病病例中的有效性。通过使用美国的代表性横截面样本(国家健康与营养检查调查,NHANES III),对20岁及20岁以上的成年人进行了指南测试,而未事先诊断出糖尿病。根据他们的血糖,将其分类为非糖尿病患者(n = 6,241)或未诊断为糖尿病(n = 274)。如指南中所述,筛查何时存在一种危险因素的真实阳性率为100%,并且需要对83%的人群进行检测。当存在两种危险因素时,筛查更为有效,真阳性率相近(98%),但只需要检测59%的人群。一个值得注意的发现是少数族裔的发病年龄较早,这可能与其他健康差异有关。由于糖尿病发生在少数民族中,年龄较小,因此筛查年龄≥40岁且年龄≥30岁的白人具有很高的真实阳性率(95%),并且降低了检测率(60%)。如果遵循该筛查指南,将是有效的,并且从根本上消除未诊断的糖尿病病例。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号