首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America >Comparative homology agreement search: An effective combination of homology-search methods
【24h】

Comparative homology agreement search: An effective combination of homology-search methods

机译:比较同源性一致性搜索:同源性搜索方法的有效组合

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Many methods have been developed to search for homologous members of a protein family in databases, and the reliability of results and conclusions may be compromised if only one method is used, neglecting the others. Here we introduce a general scheme for combining such methods. Based on this scheme, we implemented a tool called comparative homology agreement search (CHASE) that integrates different search strategies to obtain a combined "E value." Our results show that a consensus method integrating distinct strategies easily outperforms any of its component algorithms. More specifically, an evaluation based on the Structural Classification of Proteins database reveals that, on average, a coverage of 47% can be obtained in searches for distantly related homologues (i.e., members of the same superfamily but not the same family, which is a very difficult task), accepting only 10 false positives, whereas the individual methods obtain a coverage of 28-38%.
机译:已经开发出许多方法来在数据库中搜索蛋白质家族的同源成员,并且如果仅使用一种方法而忽略其他方法,则可能会损害结果和结论的可靠性。在这里,我们介绍了一种组合这些方法的一般方案。基于此方案,我们实现了一种称为比较同源性协议搜索(CHASE)的工具,该工具集成了不同的搜索策略以获得组合的“ E值”。我们的结果表明,整合不同策略的共识方法很容易胜过其任何组成算法。更具体地说,根据蛋白质的结构分类数据库进行的评估显示,平均而言,搜索遥远相关的同源物(即,同一超家族的成员而不是同一家族的成员)可获得47%的覆盖率。非常困难的任务),仅接受10个误报,而单个方法的覆盖率则为28-38%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号