...
首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers >Flow control using unsteady pulsed holed suction with different excitation models in a highly loaded compressor cascade
【24h】

Flow control using unsteady pulsed holed suction with different excitation models in a highly loaded compressor cascade

机译:在高负荷压缩机级联中使用具有不同激励模型的非稳态脉冲孔吸力进行流量控制

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Unsteady pulsed holed suction as a new unsteady flow control technique is first proposed. Unsteady excitation models of four different waveforms (Waveforms 1, 2, 3, and 4) based on unsteady pulsed holed suction are investigated to analysis comparatively the control effects of flow separations in a certain highly loaded compressor. Some related unsteady aerodynamic parameters such as excitation frequency and excitation location are studies. The unsteady pulsed holed suctions of the four different modes (Waveforms 1, 2, 3, and 4) all effectively control flow separations. Their optimum frequencies are all an integer multiple of the natural frequency of vortex shedding. And their excitation locations gaining positive effect and optimal excitation locations are both same. The optimal excitation location is near the separation point of upper endwall in unexcited case. But, they show markedly different performances in reducing the total pressure losses. The unsteady pulsed holed suction of Waveform 3 shows greater advantage at different excitation frequencies and excitation locations. The optimum result is obtained by the unsteady pulsed holed suction of Waveform 3. The total pressure loss is reduced by 16.8%. Simultaneously, the unsteady pulsed holed suctions of the four different modes all can provide better effects than the steady constant holed suction in reducing the total pressure loss with the same suction-to-inlet time-averaged suction flow ratio m(s). Especially at m(s)=0.29%, for the steady constant holed suction, it is too small to effectively control flow separation, and consequently the total pressure loss are increased by 8.3%. However, for the unsteady pulsed holed suctions of Waveforms 2 and 3, the total pressure losses are reduced by 9.1% and 4.3%, respectively.
机译:首先提出了非定常脉冲孔吸力作为一种新的非定常流量控制技术。研究了基于非稳态脉冲孔吸力的四种不同波形(波形1、2、3和4)的非稳态激励模型,以比较分析在某台高负荷压缩机中流分离的控制效果。研究了一些相关的非稳态空气动力学参数,例如激励频率和激励位置。四种不同模式(波形1、2、3和4)的不稳定脉冲孔式吸力都可以有效地控制流分离。它们的最佳频率都是涡旋脱落固有频率的整数倍。它们的激励位置获得了积极的效果,最优的激励位置都相同。在非激励情况下,最佳激励位置在上端壁的分离点附近。但是,它们在减少总压力损失方面表现出明显不同的性能。在不同的激励频率和激励位置,波形3的非稳态脉冲孔式吸力显示出更大的优势。最佳结果是通过波形3的不稳定脉冲孔抽吸获得的。总压力损失减少了16.8%。同时,在相同的吸入口与吸入口的时间平均吸入流量比m(s)的情况下,四种不同模式的非稳态脉冲孔式吸入都比稳定恒定孔式吸入提供更好的效果,从而减少了总压力损失。尤其是在m(s)= 0.29%时,对于恒定恒定的带孔吸力而言,它太小而无法有效地控制流分离,因此总压力损失增加了8.3%。但是,对于波形2和3的不稳定脉冲钻孔,总压力损失分别降低了9.1%和4.3%。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号