...
首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers >Comparison between multi-objective and single-objective optimization for the modeling of dynamic systems
【24h】

Comparison between multi-objective and single-objective optimization for the modeling of dynamic systems

机译:动态系统建模的多目标和单目标优化比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

Modeling input-output data representing a dynamic system is a challenging task when multiple objectives are involved. The developed model needs to be parsimonious yet still adequate. To achieve these goals, two objective functions, i.e. optimum structure and minimum predictive error, need to be satisfied. Most works in system identification only consider one objective function, i.e. minimum predictive error, and the model structure is obtained by trial and error. This paper attempts to establish the needs of a multi-objective optimization algorithm by comparing it with a single-objective optimization algorithm. In this study, two different types of optimization algorithms are used to model a discrete-time system. These are an elitist non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm for multi-objective optimization and a modified genetic algorithm for single-objective optimization. Simulated and real systems data are studied for comparison in terms of model predictive accuracy and model complexity. The results show the advantage of the multi-objective optimization algorithm compared with the single-objective optimization algorithm in developing an adequate and parsimonious model for a discrete-time system.
机译:当涉及多个目标时,对表示动态系统的输入输出数据进行建模是一项艰巨的任务。开发的模型需要简约但仍足够。为了实现这些目标,需要满足两个目标功能,即最佳结构和最小预测误差。系统识别中的大多数工作仅考虑一个目标函数,即最小预测误差,并且通过反复试验获得模型结构。本文试图通过与单目标优化算法进行比较来建立多目标优化算法的需求。在这项研究中,使用两种不同类型的优化算法对离散时间系统进行建模。这些是用于多目标优化的精英非支配排序遗传算法和用于单目标优化的改进遗传算法。研究了模拟和实际系统数据,以便在模型预测准确性和模型复杂性方面进行比较。结果表明,与单目标优化算法相比,多目标优化算法在为离散时间系统建立充分而简约的模型方面具有优势。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号