...
首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers >Reliability assessment on prediction of pile bearing capacity
【24h】

Reliability assessment on prediction of pile bearing capacity

机译:桩承载力预测的可靠性评估

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

There are many prediction methods that can be used to determine the bearing capacity of pipe pile. However, most of these methods are highly sensitive to specific in situ conditions and hence usually result in significant error. Therefore, it is important to evaluate the reliability of different pile bearing capacity prediction methods. Based on reliability theory, a computer code is developed in this paper to calculate reliability. Random variable statistic properties and corresponding reliabilities for different prediction methods are investigated and analysed. Results show that the reliability index for logarithmic normal distribution is higher than normal distribution. Analysis results demonstrate that the checking point method (JC method) method has a slightly lower efficiency than the Monte-Carlo importance sampling method and the Monte-Carlo direct sampling method. The Monte-Carlo importance sampling method has a higher efficiency than the Monte-Carlo direct sampling method. The Monte-Carlo importance sampling method can be used in major engineering projects. It is concluded that the clustering centre method has higher reliability in predicting pile bearing capacity than the Eslami and Fellenius method, Almeida method and Powell method.
机译:有许多预测方法可用于确定管桩的承载力。但是,大多数这些方法对特定的现场条件高度敏感,因此通常会导致明显的误差。因此,评估不同桩承载力预测方法的可靠性很重要。基于可靠性理论,本文开发了一种计算机代码来计算可靠性。研究并分析了不同预测方法的随机变量统计特性和相应的可靠性。结果表明,对数正态分布的可靠性指标高于正态分布。分析结果表明,检查点方法(JC方法)的效率略低于蒙特卡洛重要性采样方法和蒙特卡洛直接采样方法。蒙特卡洛重要性采样方法比蒙特卡洛直接采样方法具有更高的效率。蒙特卡洛重要性抽样方法可用于大型工程项目。得出的结论是,聚类中心法比Eslami和Fellenius法,Almeida法和Powell法具有更高的可靠性。

著录项

  • 来源
  • 作者

    Yong-hong Miao; Jie Yin;

  • 作者单位

    Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, People's Republic of China;

    Department of Civil Engineering, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Mechanics, Jiangsu University, Zhenjiang, People's Republic of China Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

    geotechnical engineering/piles; piiing/risk; probability analysis;

    机译:岩土工程/桩;ii /风险概率分析;

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号