首页> 外文期刊>Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers >What lies hidden behind structural errors and failures within the UK?
【24h】

What lies hidden behind structural errors and failures within the UK?

机译:谎言隐藏在英国内的结构错误和故障的背后?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Government figures from a House of Commons research briefing confirms that the components of the gross domestic product by industry are accounted for by the service sector at 79%, production at 14%, construction at 6% and agriculture at 1%. In its 2018 construction statistics, the Office for National Statistics (ONS) records that the construction industry is worth c. £100 billion annually to the UK economy. However, the Get it Right Initiative suggested in 2017 that a minimum of 10% of this is lost in errors and litigation. According to the ONS figures there were 30 fatalities. To investigate these errors and failures, this paper considers key areas in the education of chartered engineers, quality management systems and knowledge sharing in order to gain experience. A series of open-ended, semi-structured interviews was undertaken with senior professionals, including the judiciary, professors of engineering, global consultants and professional indemnity insurers. Research findings revealed that technical knowledge is deliberately withheld due to non-disclosure clauses in mediated settlements and through the practices of global professional indemnity insurers. A study of pass rates for chartered membership of the Institution of Structural Engineers showed a decrease despite an increase in academic requirements. Companies that promote corporate social responsibility credentials often seek the best commercial deal regarding litigation settlement. This research concludes that there is a sound business case for sharing knowledge, which would reduce claims, increase profits and save lives. Primary legislation must be changed to compel a free exchange of technical knowledge regarding errors and structural failures. A 'no-blame' repository needs to be established that should help reduce the adversarial nature of the construction industry. Additionally, the suitability of the academic degree curriculum for structural engineers needs to be reassessed.
机译:来自公共院的政府数据研究简报证实,由行业的国内生产总值的组成部分占服务部门的79%,产量为14%,施工为6%,农业为1%。在2018年建设统计数据中,国家统计局(ONS)记录,建筑行业值得c。每年为英国经济1000万英镑。但是,在2017年提出了正确的倡议,其中最少10%的错误损失了错误和诉讼。根据ONS数字,有30个死亡。为了调查这些错误和失败,本文考虑了特许工程师,质量管理系统和知识共享教育的关键领域,以获得经验。一系列开放式半结构化访谈是为高级专业人士进行的,包括司法机构,工程教授,全球顾问和专业赔偿保险公司。研究结果表明,由于介导的定居点的不披露条款以及通过全球专业赔偿保险公司的实践,技术知识因未披露条款而故意扣留。尽管学术要求增加,但结构工程机构的特许成员资格的通行证率的研究表明,尽管学术要求增加,但仍然减少。促进企业社会责任全权证书的公司经常寻求有关诉讼解决方案的最佳商业交易。这项研究得出结论,有一个合理的商业案例,用于分享知识,这将减少索赔,增加利润和拯救生命。必须更改主要立法,以强制免费交换关于错误和结构失败的技术知识。需要建立一个“无责任”储存库,这应该有助于减少建筑业的对抗性。此外,需要重新评估结构工程师学位课程的适用性。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号