首页> 外文期刊>Population health management >Socioeconomic Factors and Health Outcome Metrics in Africa: Cross-national Comparisons from 1995-2011
【24h】

Socioeconomic Factors and Health Outcome Metrics in Africa: Cross-national Comparisons from 1995-2011

机译:非洲的社会经济因素和健康成果指标:1995-2011年的跨国比较

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

In the past 2 decades, many countries in the Economic Community of West African States (ECOWAS: Member countries include Ghana, Gambia, Sierra Leone, Liberia, Nigeria, Burkina Faso, Cote D'Ivoire, Benin, Togo, Guinea, Guinea Bissau, Mauritania, Mali, Senegal, Niger, and Cape Verde) have introduced health care policies that have led to reforms. The health care reforms are efforts directed toward containment of public spending on health services while at the same time achieving better health outcomes. However, the improvement of population health outcomes also could be dependent on the health care system and its resource inputs as well as non-health-related issues. The definition and measurement of health outcomes are deemed as the first teething problem that needs to be addressed before one can proceed to estimate a health production function. At the moment, there is no concrete measure that could be employed to measure health outcomes to encompass the various facets of health status at both the macro level and on a comparable basis across economies. However, we contend that the best population health outcomes metric ought to reflect a population's vibrant state of mental, social, and physical well-being. This implies that for a country to experience a positive health status, its population should be mentally, socially, and physically sound, and have a sense of well-being to keep it alive. In this letter, we focus on 3 population health metrics: (1) under-5 mortality; (2) life expectancy at birth; and (3) infant mortality.
机译:在过去的20年中,西非国家经济共同体(西非国家经济共同体:成员国包括加纳,冈比亚,塞拉利昂,利比里亚,尼日利亚,布基纳法索,科特迪瓦,贝宁,多哥,几内亚,几内亚比绍,毛里塔尼亚,马里,塞内加尔,尼日尔和佛得角)已经出台了导致改革的医疗政策。医疗保健改革是旨在控制公共医疗保健支出,同时实现更好的健康成果的努力。但是,人口健康结果的改善也可能取决于卫生保健系统及其资源投入以及与健康无关的问题。健康结果的定义和衡量被认为是第一个需要解决的问题,然后才能开始估算健康生产功能。目前,尚无可用于衡量健康结果的具体措施来涵盖宏观水平以及各个经济体的可比基础上的健康状况的各个方面。但是,我们认为最佳的人口健康结果指标应该反映出人口的精神,社会和身体健康状况。这意味着一个国家要享有积极的健康状况,其人口应在心理,社会和身体上保持健康,并具有幸福感,以使其存活。在这封信中,我们重点关注三个人口健康指标:(1)5岁以下儿童死亡率; (2)出生时的预期寿命; (3)婴儿死亡率。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Population health management》 |2014年第5期|318-319|共2页
  • 作者单位

    Unit of Intervention and Implementation Research, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden;

    Department of Economics and Management, University of Ferrara, Ferrara, Italy;

    Department of Public Health Sciences, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

  • 入库时间 2022-08-18 03:47:29

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号