首页> 外文期刊>Popular Music & Society >Dancing without Music: Copyright and Australian Nightclubs
【24h】

Dancing without Music: Copyright and Australian Nightclubs

机译:没有音乐跳舞:版权和澳大利亚夜总会

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
获取外文期刊封面目录资料

摘要

This article examines the two-year legal dispute between a major royalty collection body for Australian popular music composers, the PPCA (Phonographic Performance Company of Australia) and Australian music venue organizations concerning the license fees paid by venues for the use of sound recordings in nightclubs and dance party venues. I examine the court ruling (http//:www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/ACopy/T/20071.html) delivered in July 2007, drawing on my work as an expert witness and consultant for the PPCA throughout the case. As a court action that attracted considerable debate among DJs, musicians, and the music press, it raises important questions not just about the rates and methods of collecting performance royalties, but also the contribution of contemporary music to the health of night-time economies, and the difficulties in achieving a proper balance between composers' rights and maintaining a diversity of venue experiences and revenues. The case highlights a national example of an ongoing, international focus upon “secondary” rights as an increasingly important source of artist and recording company revenues.View full textDownload full textRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03007760903086177
机译:本文研究了澳大利亚流行音乐作曲家的主要特许权使用费收取机构,PPCA(澳大利亚唱片表演公司)与澳大利亚音乐场馆组织之间为期两年的法律纠纷,该纠纷涉及场馆为在夜总会中使用录音而支付的许可费和舞会场地。我以专家的身份研究了2007年7月发布的法院裁决(http:///:www.austlii.edu.au/cgi-bin/sinodisp/au/cases/cth/ACopy/T/20071.html)整个案件中PPCA的证人和顾问。作为一项法院诉讼,引起了DJ,音乐家和音乐媒体的广泛争论,它不仅提出了收取表演版税的费率和方法,而且还提出了当代音乐对夜间经济健康的贡献等重要问题,难以在作曲家的权利之间取得适当的平衡,以及保持场地经验和收入的多样性。此案突显了一个全国性的例子,表明国际上一直在关注“次要”权利,因为它是越来越重要的艺术家和唱片公司收入的来源。查看全文下载全文相关的var addthis_config = {ui_cobrand:“ Taylor&Francis Online”, services_compact:“ citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,可口,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,更多”,发布:“ ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b”};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03007760903086177

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号