首页> 外文期刊>Policing >The detection of deception by linguistic means Unresolved issues of validity, usefulness and epistemology
【24h】

The detection of deception by linguistic means Unresolved issues of validity, usefulness and epistemology

机译:语言手段对欺骗的发现有效性,有用性和认识论的未解决问题

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
       

摘要

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to discuss unresolved problems that are reflected in the social scientific research on the linguistic detection of deception in statements, with particular attention to problems of methodology, practical utility for law enforcement statement analysts, and epistemology. Design/methodology/approach - The author reviewed the design, data, statistical calculations, and findings of English language peer-reviewed studies of the linguistic detection of deception in statements. In some cases, the author re-analyzed the study data. Findings - Social scientific research holds promise for the development of new methods of linguistic detection of deception that are more thoroughly validated than the linguistic methods law enforcement investigators have been using for many years. Nonetheless, published studies reflect one or more of the following sources of weakness in developing and evaluating detection models: the use of analytes (statements) of uncertain validity; the problematic universality and practical utility of linguistic variables; the widespread use of deficient proportion-of-stimuli-correct "hit rate" calculations to assess the accuracy of detection methods; a possibly irresolvable epistemological limit to the ability of any linguistic detection method to prove deception without confirmation by means external to the analysis. Research limitations/implications - The research was limited to English language studies in the linguistic detection of deception literature and to the re-calculation of data in the research literature. Whether the paper has implications for future studies depends on the success of two arguments that are made: the published research projects in the field reflect one or more of four methodological problems that create doubt about the validity and/or the practical utility of their results; and the linguistic detection of deception is subject to an epistemological problem which theoretically limits the ability of any linguistic method of detection to establish with certainty the status of any particular questioned statement. Originality/value - This is the first published paper to identify and discuss a possibly irresolvable epistemological issue in the detection of deception by linguistic means, as well as unresolved issues of methodology and of utility to law enforcement analysts that characterize the research and the detection models in this field. It is also the first published paper to deconstruct the simple hit rate (and its variants) in order to demonstrate its deficiencies.
机译:目的-本文的目的是讨论关于陈述中欺骗手段的语言检测的社会科学研究所反映的未解决的问题,尤其是方法论,执法陈述分析师的实用性和认识论方面的问题。设计/方法/方法-作者回顾了设计,数据,统计计算以及对英语中对陈述中欺骗手段进行语言检测的同行评审研究的结果。在某些情况下,作者重新分析了研究数据。调查结果-社会科学研究为开发欺骗手段的语言学检测新方法提供了希望,该方法比执法调查人员多年来使用的语言学方法得到了更彻底的验证。但是,已发表的研究反映了以下一种或多种在开发和评估检测模型方面的弱点来源:使用不确定性有效的分析物(陈述);语言变量的普遍性和实用性问题;广泛使用不足的正确比例的“命中率”计算来评估检测方法的准确性;任何语言检测方法证明欺骗而没有通过分析外部手段​​确认的能力的认识论上的局限性可能是无法解决的。研究的局限性/含意-研究仅限于英语语言研究中欺骗文学的语言检测以及研究文献中数据的重新计算。论文是否对未来的研究有影响,取决于所提出的两个论点的成功:在该领域发表的研究项目反映了四个方法学问题中的一个或多个,这些问题对结果的有效性和/或实用性产生怀疑。语言欺骗的检测受到一个认识论问题的困扰,该问题理论上限制了任何语言检测方法确定性地确定任何特定疑问陈述状态的能力。原创性/价值-这是第一篇发表的论文,旨在识别和讨论在通过语言手段进行欺骗检测中可能无法解决的认识论问题,以及尚未解决的方法论和实用性问题,这些问题对于表征该研究和检测模型的执法分析人员而言在这个领域里。它也是第一个发表的论文,以解构简单的命中率(及其变体)以证明其不足之处。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号