首页> 外文期刊>Policing & Society >Showcasing security: the politics of policing space at the 2007 Sydney APEC meeting
【24h】

Showcasing security: the politics of policing space at the 2007 Sydney APEC meeting

机译:展示安全性:在2007年悉尼APEC会议上监管太空的政治

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Using the example of the 2007 Sydney APEC meeting, this article develops a critique of the protest policing literature. While it is accepted that international summits such as APEC are exceptional events, which are policed differently, the view that there has been a general democratisation of protest policing across liberal democracies is contested. Since the Battle of Seattle in 1999 and especially since the terror attacks of 2001, the policing of protest has come to entail a complex combination of ‘hard’ and ‘soft’ techniques, including the potential use of powers formerly reserved only for the security services. Under these circumstances civil liberties are threatened, the doctrine of the separation of powers risks violation, and the rule of law is undermined. Increasingly, power resides in the executive branch of the state and policing becomes politicised as a consequence. That politicisation is accentuated at international events such as APEC where national governments and, in turn, the police are subject to supranational pressure exerted by market forces under conditions of global neoliberalism. Accordingly, host nations set out to showcase security in an effort to promote host cities as safe places for tourism and capital investment. In light of the above, and in contradistinction to what some protest policing scholars suggest, the article considers it is not unreasonable to regard the police as principal agents in the repressive state apparatus.View full textDownload full textKeywordsAPEC, global cities, globalisation, neoliberal urbanism, policing space, protest policing, neoliberalismRelated var addthis_config = { ui_cobrand: "Taylor & Francis Online", services_compact: "citeulike,netvibes,twitter,technorati,delicious,linkedin,facebook,stumbleupon,digg,google,more", pubid: "ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b" }; Add to shortlist Link Permalink http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2010.540659
机译:本文以2007年悉尼APEC会议为例,对抗议警务文献进行了评论。尽管人们公认诸如APEC之类的国际峰会是例外事件,对它们的监管方式有所不同,但人们对跨自由民主国家的抗议警务普遍民主化的观点提出了质疑。自1999年西雅图海战以来,尤其是自2001年恐怖袭击以来,抗议的治安工作已将“硬”和“软”技术进行了复​​杂的结合,包括以前可能使用的权力保留仅用于安全服务。在这种情况下,公民自由受到威胁,三权分立的原则有受到侵犯的危险,法治受到破坏。权力越来越多地驻留在国家的行政部门中,因此,治安变得政治化。在诸如亚太经合组织之类的国际事件中,这种政治化更加突出,在这种事件中,各国政府以及警察受到全球新自由主义条件下市场力量施加的超国家压力。因此,东道国开始展示安全,以努力促进东道城市成为旅游和资本投资的安全场所。鉴于上述情况,并且与一些抗议治安学者的建议相矛盾,本文认为将警察作为镇压性国家机构中的主要代理人并非没有道理。查看全文下载全文关键字APEC,全球城市,全球化,新自由主义城市主义,治安空间,抗议治安,新自由主义相关的变量add add_id ra-4dff56cd6bb1830b“};添加到候选列表链接永久链接http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10439463.2010.540659

著录项

  • 来源
    《Policing & Society》 |2011年第1期|p.27-48|共22页
  • 作者

    Greg Martina*;

  • 作者单位
  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号