...
首页> 外文期刊>Podiatry Now >Cost comparison: orthoses - an audit.In-house manufacture from sheet materials vs prefabricated orthoses
【24h】

Cost comparison: orthoses - an audit.In-house manufacture from sheet materials vs prefabricated orthoses

机译:成本比较:矫形器-审核从板材到预制矫形器的内部制造

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

A substantial cost advantage was shown with the use of prefabricated insoles with additional materials added during clinical time. This method enabled the biomechanics specialist podiatrist to continue to prescribe and supply custom-made orthoses.rnThis method did not result in any loss of therapeutic value and was well accepted by patients. Efficacy of both sets of orthoses was shown to be positive in terms of reduced pain scores and increased ability in walking and standing.
机译:在临床期间,使用预制鞋垫并添加其他材料可显示出显着的成本优势。这种方法使生物力学专家足病医生能够继续开处方并提供定制的矫形器。这种方法不会导致治疗价值的任何损失,并为患者所接受。两组矫形器的有效性均显示出积极的结果,即疼痛评分降低,行走和站立能力增强。

著录项

  • 来源
    《Podiatry Now》 |2009年第6期|17-23|共7页
  • 作者

    Sarah Brocklesby; Chris Wooles;

  • 作者单位

    Biomechanics South Gloucestershire PCT Podiatry Department;

  • 收录信息
  • 原文格式 PDF
  • 正文语种 eng
  • 中图分类
  • 关键词

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号