A demand response manipulation case will not be halted to allow anappellate court to weigh in on whether the Federal Energy RegulatoryCommission’s enforcement action against a Maine energy consultingcompany and its managing member was time-barred.The US District Court of the District of Maine in January ruled thatFERC acted timely and within the five-year statute of limitations foundin 28 U.S.C. § 2462, a federal statute on timing of enforcementproceedings. In an order issued Wednesday, the court found no“controlling question of law as to which there is a substantial groundfor difference of opinion” that would warrant an interlocutory appeal ofits January decision to the 1st US Circuit Court of Appeals.
展开▼
机译：不会停止需求响应操纵案，以使上诉法院能够权衡联邦能源监管委员会针对缅因州能源咨询公司及其管理成员的强制执行行动是否受到时间限制。 r n缅因州美国地区法院在一月裁定， r nFERC及时采取行动，并在发现的时效五年法令范围内 r n在28 USC第2462条，关于执行时间的联邦法规。在周三发布的命令中，法院认为没有“控制性问题，即存在意见分歧的重大理由的法律控制权”，因此可以向1月的裁决提出中间上诉。美国第一巡回上诉法院。
展开▼
