首页> 外文期刊>Plasma Science, IEEE Transactions on >Comparative Studies of Double Dielectric Barrier Discharge and Microwave Argon Plasma Jets at Atmospheric Pressure for Biomedical Applications
【24h】

Comparative Studies of Double Dielectric Barrier Discharge and Microwave Argon Plasma Jets at Atmospheric Pressure for Biomedical Applications

机译:大气压双介电势垒放电和微波氩等离子体射流的比较研究

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Two low-temperature plasma jets using argon carrier gas at atmospheric pressure have been experimentally characterized using optical emission diagnostics. The first one is a double dielectric barrier discharge (DBD) plasma jet generated by a pulsed power supply (9 kV, 9.69 kHz, duty cycle: 1%) and the second one is a microwave (MW) induced plasma jet (2.45 GHz, 40 W ). The argon gas (4.5 purity) flowing through the quartz tube used to launch the plasma in open air is kept at 1 L/min for both plasma devices. Some thermodynamic parameters such as rotation () and excitation () temperatures have been determined as well as some plasma active species such as electron density, ultraviolet C (UVC) irradiance, and atomic oxygen concentrations. Most of these plasma parameters are spatially resolved along the plasma jet axis using the spectra of atomic lines (Ar and O) in the visible range and molecular bands (N and OH) in the UV range. At the tube outlet, the electron density and atomic oxygen concentration are one decade higher in the case of the dielectric barrier discharges (DBDs) plasma jet while is higher in the case of the MW plasma jet. These differences are mainly due to the way of plasma generation. Indeed, the guided-ionization waves generated by the DBD setup cause higher nonequilibrium phenomena since the difference between and is shown to be much larger in the DBD case. Furthermore, at the tube outlet, it is shown that UVC irradiance produced by the MW plasma jet is about twice as large as that of the DBD plasma jet. - owever, at 1.7 cm away from the tube outlet, the differences between the two plasma setups on temperatures and active species production become less significant. For instance, the plasma gas temperature measured with a thermocouple becomes the same (320 K) showing the ability of both plasma setups to be used in biomedical applications without inducing a significant thermal effect.
机译:使用光发射诊断技术已对使用大气压氩气的两次低温等离子体射流进行了实验表征。第一个是脉冲电源(9 kV,9.69 kHz,占空比:1%)生成的双介电势垒放电(DBD)等离子流,第二个是微波(MW)感应的等离子流(2.45 GHz, 40 W)。对于两个等离子设备,流经用于在户外释放等离子体的石英管的氩气(纯度为4.5)保持在1 L / min。确定了一些热力学参数,例如旋转()和激发()温度,以及一些等离子体活性物质,例如电子密度,紫外线(UVC)辐照度和原子氧浓度。使用在可见光范围内的原子线(Ar和O)和在UV范围内的分子带(N和OH)的光谱,沿等离子体射流轴在空间上解析大多数这些等离子体参数。在管出口处,在电介质阻挡层放电(DBD)等离子体射流的情况下,电子密度和原子氧浓度高十倍,而在MW等离子体射流的情况下,电子密度和原子氧浓度更高。这些差异主要归因于等离子体产生的方式。实际上,由于DBD设置之间的差异在DBD情况下要大得多,因此DBD设置生成的引导电离波会引起更高的非平衡现象。此外,在管出口处,显示出由MW等离子体射流产生的UVC辐照度大约是DBD等离子体射流的UVC辐照度的两倍。 -然而,在距试管出口1.7 cm处,两种等离子体设置之间在温度和活性物质产生方面的差异变得不那么明显。例如,用热电偶测量的等离子气体温度变为相同的温度(320 K),这表明两种等离子设置都可以在生物医学应用中使用而不会引起明显的热效应。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号