...
首页> 外文期刊>Plant Ecology >Disturbance persistence in managed grasslands: shifts in aboveground community structure and the weed seed bank
【24h】

Disturbance persistence in managed grasslands: shifts in aboveground community structure and the weed seed bank

机译:托管草原中的干扰持续性:地上群落结构和杂草种子库的变化

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

The length of time and form in which disturbances persist in systems depends on the intensity and frequency of disturbance and on the abilities of resident species to recover from such events. In grazed grasslands, trampling by large mammalian herbivores can periodically facilitate weed establishment by exposing patches of bare ground but whether an intense soil disturbance event results in a temporary increase in weed abundance or a persistent weed problem remains unclear. In May 2002, cattle trampling following heavy rain caused severe damage to nine-month old, rotationally grazed, cool-season pastures (Midwest USA). In September 2002, we compared the aboveground composition of paddocks (i.e., fenced pasture sections) that were heavily disturbed to those that received no damage. Relative to undisturbed paddocks, forage species relative cover was 17% lower in disturbed paddocks, and weed species and bare ground relative cover was 61% and 100% higher, respectively. By September 2004, paddock types did not differ in all aboveground community components. However, the abundance and species richness of weed seeds in the soil seed bank averaged respectively 82% and 30% higher in disturbed paddocks between 2003 and 2004. These findings indicate that a spatially extensive, intense soil disturbance event may soon become undetectable in components of aboveground pasture structure but can persist as an augmented weed seed bank. Because of high weed seed bank longevity, disturbances to formerly disturbed pastures would likely result in higher weed recruitment, with more species represented, than in those which lack previous disturbance. Disturbance history may thus be a useful predictor of weed community composition following subsequent disturbance. Based on empirical data supporting this proposition, we recommend that grassland managers explicitly incorporate disturbance history into dynamic management planning and do not rely exclusively on aboveground characters to evaluate the invasion status or colonization potential of an area by undesirable plants. We emphasize that the ecological legacies of past soil disturbance events cannot only influence the contemporary patterns and processes of grasslands, but importantly, affect their compositional trajectories following subsequent perturbation.
机译:系统中干扰持续存在的时间和形式取决于干扰的强度和频率以及居民物种从此类事件中恢复的能力。在放牧的草原上,大型哺乳动物食草动物的践踏可以通过裸露裸露的地面来周期性地促进杂草的形成,但是尚不清楚强烈的土壤干扰事件会导致杂草暂时增加或永久性杂草问题。 2002年5月,大雨后践踏的牛对9个月大,轮牧,凉爽季节的牧场造成了严重破坏(美国中西部)。在2002年9月,我们比较了受到严重破坏的围场(即围栏牧场部分)和没有受到破坏的围场的地上成分。相对于不受干扰的围场,受干扰的围场中的牧草物种相对覆盖率降低了17%,杂草物种和裸露的地面相对覆盖率分别提高了61%和100%。到2004年9月,围场的类型在所有地上社区组成部分中都没有差异。但是,在2003年至2004年之间,受干扰的围场中土壤种子库中杂草种子的丰度和物种丰富度分别平均增加了82%和30%。这些发现表明,空间分布广泛,强烈的土壤干扰事件可能很快就不会被发现。地上牧草结构,但可以作为杂草种子库继续存在。由于杂草种子库寿命长,与以前没有干扰的牧场相比,对以前受到干扰的牧场的干扰可能导致杂草的增加,且杂草占更多的物种。因此,干扰史可能是随后干扰后杂草群落组成的有用预测指标。基于支持该命题的经验数据,我们建议草原管理者将干扰历史明确地纳入动态管理规划中,而不应仅依靠地上特征来评估不良植物对某个地区的入侵状况或殖民潜力。我们强调,过去土壤扰动事件的生态遗产不仅会影响当代草原的格局和过程,而且重要的是会影响随后的扰动后它们的组成轨迹。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号