...
首页> 外文期刊>Philosophical Psychology >Language Learning in Infancy: Does the Empirical Evidence Support a Domain Specific Language Acquisition Device?
【24h】

Language Learning in Infancy: Does the Empirical Evidence Support a Domain Specific Language Acquisition Device?

机译:婴儿期的语言学习:经验证据是否支持特定领域的语言习得设备?

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
           

摘要

Poverty of the Stimulus Arguments have convinced many linguists and philosophers of language that a domain specific language acquisition device (LAD) is necessary to account for language learning. Here we review empirical evidence that casts doubt on the necessity of this domain specific device. We suggest that more attention needs to be paid to the early stages of language acquisition. Many seemingly innate language-related abilities have to be learned over the course of several months. Further, the language input contains rich stochastic information that can be accessed by domain-general learning mechanisms. Computer simulation has shown how mechanisms that are not domain specific can exploit the information contained in language. We conclude that (i) Poverty of the Stimulus Arguments need to be conceptually clarified and (ii) more empirical research needs to be carried out before we can rule out that data driven general purpose mechanisms can account for language learning.
机译:刺激论的贫困使许多语言学家和语言哲学家相信,特定领域的语言习得设备(LAD)是解决语言学习所必需的。在这里,我们回顾了经验证据,这些证据使人们对该领域特定设备的必要性产生怀疑。我们建议需要更多地注意语言习得的早期阶段。在几个月的过程中,必须学习许多看似与语言有关的先天能力。此外,语言输入包含丰富的随机信息,可以由领域通用学习机制访问。计算机仿真显示了非特定于域的机制如何利用语言中包含的信息。我们得出的结论是:(i)在概念上需要澄清刺激论点的贫困,并且(ii)需要进行更多的经验研究,然后才能排除数据驱动的通用机制可以解释语言学习的问题。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号