...
首页> 外文期刊>Philosophical Magazine >Strain glass in ferroelastic systems: Premartensitic tweed versus strain glass
【24h】

Strain glass in ferroelastic systems: Premartensitic tweed versus strain glass

机译:铁弹性系统中的应变玻璃:马氏体花呢与应变玻璃

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例
   

获取外文期刊封面封底 >>

       

摘要

Cluster-spin glass and ferroelectric relaxors have been observed in defect-containing ferromagnetic systems and ferroelectric systems, respectively. However, it is unclear whether or not an analogous glass state exists in the physically parallel ferroelastic (or martensitic) systems. In the 1990s, theoretical studies suggested that premartensitic tweed could be viewed as a strain glass. However, there has been no experimental verification of this hypothesis. In this paper, we provide an experimental test of this hypothesis by measuring the possible glass signatures in two well-known premartensitic tweed systems prior to their martensitic transformation: one Ni63Al37 and the other Ti50Ni47Fe3 martensitic alloy. Our experiments show that no glass signatures exist for the premartensitic tweed in both systems. There is no mechanical susceptibility/modulus anomaly in the tweed temperature regime, suggesting no glass transition exists. The tweed remains ergodic, inconsistent with a frozen glass. These two critical experiments show that premartensitic tweed is not a frozen glass state. We demonstrate that strain glass exists in ferroelastic/martensitic systems but only in defect-containing ferroelastic/martensitic systems with defect concentration exceeding a critical value. This strain glass is a mechanical analogue of cluster-spin glass or ferroelectric relaxors, and possesses all the features of a glass. We further show that the tweed is equivalent to an ‘unfrozen state’ of a strain glass. Finally, we demonstrate that the microscopic origin of the strain glass can be easily understood in analogy with the behavior of a ‘defect-containing domino array’.
机译:分别在含缺陷的铁磁系统和铁电系统中观察到簇旋玻璃和铁电弛豫器。但是,尚不清楚在物理上平行的铁弹性(或马氏体)体系中是否存在类似的玻璃态。在1990年代,理论研究表明,马氏体前花呢可被视为应变玻璃。但是,尚未对该假设进行实验验证。在本文中,我们通过测量两种已知的马氏体前花呢系统在其马氏体转变之前可能的玻璃特征来对这一假设进行实验性测试:一个Ni 63 Al 37 和其他Ti 50 Ni 47 Fe 3 马氏体合金。我们的实验表明,两个系统中的马氏体花呢都没有玻璃签名。在花呢温度范围内没有机械敏感性/模量异常,表明不存在玻璃化转变。该花呢仍是遍历人体的,与冷冻玻璃不一致。这两个关键实验表明,马氏体前花呢不是冷冻玻璃状态。我们证明应变玻璃存在于铁弹性/马氏体系统中,但仅存在于缺陷浓度超过临界值的含缺陷的铁弹性/马氏体系统中。这种应变玻璃是簇旋玻璃或铁电弛豫器的机械类似物,具有玻璃的所有功能。我们进一步表明,该花呢等同于应变玻璃的“未冻结状态”。最后,我们证明了应变玻璃的微观起源可以很容易地理解为类似于“含缺陷的多米诺骨牌”的行为。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号