...
首页> 外文期刊>Pennsylvania journal of environmental litigation >International Paper says Rexam general counsel's 'lay opinion' is inadmissible 'specialized knowledge'
【24h】

International Paper says Rexam general counsel's 'lay opinion' is inadmissible 'specialized knowledge'

机译:国际纸业公司表示,雷沙姆总法律顾问的“外行意见”是不可接受的“专业知识”

获取原文
获取原文并翻译 | 示例

摘要

International Paper Co. and Georgia-Pacific Consumer Products Group contended on March 9 that the "expert opinion" of a former general counsel for Rexam Corp. is not admissible in litigation over the Crown Vantage Superfund Site because it is based on his "specialized knowledge and experience" as a lawyer and is not, as claimed, a lay opinion. The case is in federal court for the District of New Jersey.
机译:国际纸业公司和佐治亚太平洋消费品集团于3月9日争辩说,雷克森公司前总法律顾问的“专家意见”在Crown Vantage超级基金网站的诉讼中不予受理,因为它基于他的“专业知识”。和经验”作为律师,并且并非如所声称的那样。该案正在新泽西州联邦法院审理。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
获取原文

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号